2007
DOI: 10.1080/00438240601136462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The significance of ‘invisible’ places

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies focusing on the functional purpose of strategic control over territories and their re sources (Lock and Harris, 1996;Stančič, 1994, p. 78), or on the visual relationships between settlements (Swanson, 2003;Topouzi et al, 2002), have been complemented by other perspectives that seek to understand cognitive aspects related to the perception of places and spaces. In this paper, I am interested in the approaches that have focused preferentially on places that have a conspicuous presence in the landscape with their outstanding natural forms, monuments or fortifications (Bernardini et al, 2013;Earl and Wheatley, 2002;Fontijn, 2007;Garcia-Moreno, 2013;García-Sanjuán et al, 2006;Mitcham, 2002;Sakaguchi et al, 2010).…”
Section: Materials and Methods Of Spatial Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies focusing on the functional purpose of strategic control over territories and their re sources (Lock and Harris, 1996;Stančič, 1994, p. 78), or on the visual relationships between settlements (Swanson, 2003;Topouzi et al, 2002), have been complemented by other perspectives that seek to understand cognitive aspects related to the perception of places and spaces. In this paper, I am interested in the approaches that have focused preferentially on places that have a conspicuous presence in the landscape with their outstanding natural forms, monuments or fortifications (Bernardini et al, 2013;Earl and Wheatley, 2002;Fontijn, 2007;Garcia-Moreno, 2013;García-Sanjuán et al, 2006;Mitcham, 2002;Sakaguchi et al, 2010).…”
Section: Materials and Methods Of Spatial Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final point about landscape deposits reprises Fontijn's (2007) distinction between visible and invisible places, as manifested in the contrast between barrow and landscape deposition in the southern Dutch Bronze Age. There, the watery zones which received so many sword and axe deposits were natural, uncultivated, and unaltered prior to deposition.…”
Section: The Prehistoric Societymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that specific parts of wetlands were used time and again for the intentional deposition of objects, in some cases stretching several millennia. Moreover, the selection of objects shifted over time (Fontijn, 2007). The persistence of this practice indicates the continuing importance of wetlands in prehistoric and early historic belief systems.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%