1994
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Significance and Future of Functional Analysis Methodologies

Abstract: and Richman (1982) presented the first comprehensive and standardized methodology for identifying operant functions of aberrant behavior. This essay discusses the significance functional analysis has had for applied behavior analysis. The methodology has lessened the field's reliance on default technologies and promoted analysis of environment-behavior interactions maintaining target responses as the basis for selecting treatments. It has also contributed to the integration of basic and applied research. Futur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
115
0
7

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
115
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose of a functional analysis (FA; Iwata, Dorsey, Slifer, Bauman, & Richman, 1982 is to identify variables that evoke and maintain instances of problem behavior. With the advent of the FA, numerous treatment options are available when treatment and operant function are matched (Mace, 1994). Although FAs often produce clear outcomes, some studies have reported ambiguous results that cannot be interpreted.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of a functional analysis (FA; Iwata, Dorsey, Slifer, Bauman, & Richman, 1982 is to identify variables that evoke and maintain instances of problem behavior. With the advent of the FA, numerous treatment options are available when treatment and operant function are matched (Mace, 1994). Although FAs often produce clear outcomes, some studies have reported ambiguous results that cannot be interpreted.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most precise form of functional behavior assessment is a functional analysis, which involves direct observation of problem behavior and systematic manipulation of its antecedents and consequences. The functional analysis is often considered the "gold standard" of functional behavior assessment because it is the only form of assessment that verifies the function of problem behavior (Bijou, Peterson, & Ault, 1968;Lennox & Miltenberger, 1989;Mace, 1994). However, the time, effort, and professional expertise required to conduct and interpret functional analyses are often cited as problems with the approach, limiting the widespread use of functional analysis by school personnel and other practitioners (cf., Spreat & Connelly, 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavior modification was an early approach that emphasized how powerful reinforcement and punishment contingencies can change behavior regardless of its causes. Applied behavior analysis was an approach that emphasized the analysis of functional relations between behavior and its causes (Mace, 1994). In the years between the late 1970s and early 1980s, a series of position papers advocated more analytic research (Birnbrauer, 1979;Michael, 1980;Pierce & Epling, 1980;Ribes, 1977).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in 1982, Iwata et al (1982 produced the first comprehensive and standardized model for conducting functional analyses. Previous theoretical papers such as that by Carr (1977), and research methods such as those proposed by Bijou, Peterson, and Ault (1968) and by Thomas, Becker, and Armstrong (1968) culminated in the Iwata et al paper (Mace, 1994) which described an operant methodology to assess functional relationships between self-injury and specific environmental events. They observed the SIB of 9 individuals with developmental disabilities during periods of brief, repeated exposure to a series of analogue conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%