2021
DOI: 10.1177/11297298211041442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The SIF protocol: A seven-step strategy to minimize complications potentially related to the insertion of femorally inserted central catheters

Abstract: The insertion of central venous catheters through the femoral veins is not uncommon and is potentially associated with the risk of immediate puncture-related complications and severe late complications as infection and thrombosis. As for other central venous access devices, the use of a standardized protocol of insertion and the correct application of evidence-based strategies are beneficial in reducing the risk of complications. We proposed a standardized protocol (S.I.F.: Safe Insertion of Femorally Inserted… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[32][33][34] In this prospective observational study, we tested a well-designed insertion bundle with the purpose of reducing the incidence of CVAD-related complications in neonates and children. For the CVAD insertions in the adult patient, the Italian group GAVeCeLT has developed "insertion bundles" for PICC insertion (peripherally inserted central catheters), 4 for CICC insertion, 3 for FICC insertion, 5 and for long-term VAD insertion. 35 The "bundle" used in this study (SIC-Ped) consists of seven strategies, all of them evidence-based: All catheters in polyurethane except * = silicon; all catheters non-cuffed except § = cuffed; # = totally implanted venous access device (port); @ = dialysis catheter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[32][33][34] In this prospective observational study, we tested a well-designed insertion bundle with the purpose of reducing the incidence of CVAD-related complications in neonates and children. For the CVAD insertions in the adult patient, the Italian group GAVeCeLT has developed "insertion bundles" for PICC insertion (peripherally inserted central catheters), 4 for CICC insertion, 3 for FICC insertion, 5 and for long-term VAD insertion. 35 The "bundle" used in this study (SIC-Ped) consists of seven strategies, all of them evidence-based: All catheters in polyurethane except * = silicon; all catheters non-cuffed except § = cuffed; # = totally implanted venous access device (port); @ = dialysis catheter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maneuver was particularly feasible in neonates and in infants, as reported in our data. (5) The tunneling technique was used in 511 patients, including all newborns (100%), most of the infants (90.75%), and more than half (58.6%) of the children. The rationale for tunneling is to ensure the most appropriate position of the emergency site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, it seems reasonable to follow a protocol-based algorithm: Brescia et. al have published a seven-step strategy to minimize periprocedural complications and propose a preliminary ultrasound assessment of the puncture site to evaluate anatomy, which is also in line with the ESA recommendations [ 7 , 16 ]. In this regard, sonographic imaging of the subclavian vein before puncture may also be required to determine vessel collapsibility during respiratory cycle and regarding volume status [ 17 ], as a certain collapsibility of the vessel may also complicate venipuncture and increase the risk for adverse events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the relative risk of infection associated with each type of CVAD is still controversial, it is widely accepted that any CVAD, either PICC or CICC or FICC, should be inserted using a proper insertion bundle designed to minimize the risk of infection, as well as the risk of other catheter-related complications (puncturerelated complications, CRT, etc.). [6][7][8][9][10] In 2010, the Italian Group for the Study of Long-Term Central Venous Access Devices (GAVeCeLT) developed the SIP protocol (Safe Insertion of PICCs) with the aim of minimizing all risks associated with PICC insertion. 10,11 This protocol provided eight evidence-based recommendations, easy to use, inexpensive, cost-effective and able to reduce not only early complications but also late complications related to insertion, including infection and catheter-related thrombosis (CRT).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%