1994
DOI: 10.1016/s1058-2746(09)80002-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The shoulder impingement syndrome: The results of surgical decompression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Paavolainen et al, 13 when the angulation is less than 120°, there is a reduction of the range of shoulder movement and pain. 12 The pain is related to a decrease in the subacromial space and is caused by the proximity of the greater tuberosity to the coracoacromial arch (Figure 4). However, we believe that the limitation of movement is also caused by 2 other important factors: (1) the proximity between the origin and the insertion of the supraspinatus muscle, which reduces its lever arm ( Figure 5), and (2) reduction of the sliding surface between the humeral head and the glenoid ( Figure 6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Paavolainen et al, 13 when the angulation is less than 120°, there is a reduction of the range of shoulder movement and pain. 12 The pain is related to a decrease in the subacromial space and is caused by the proximity of the greater tuberosity to the coracoacromial arch (Figure 4). However, we believe that the limitation of movement is also caused by 2 other important factors: (1) the proximity between the origin and the insertion of the supraspinatus muscle, which reduces its lever arm ( Figure 5), and (2) reduction of the sliding surface between the humeral head and the glenoid ( Figure 6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] It results in significant pain,[1] reduction in function and quality of life for patients including being unable to lift weight and work in their usual employment. [2] The use of arthroscopy as an alternate technique for subacromial decompression was first published by Ellman[3] with short-term follow-up demonstrating 89% satisfaction at 2 to 5 years,[4] though proponents of open acromioplasty in the last decade found no essential difference in results between the two procedures except for cosmesis and personal preference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%