The Short-Term Effects of Progressive vs. Conventional Core Stability Exercise in Rehabilitation of Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain

Chan, Ebby Waqqash Mohamad; Nadzalan, Ali Md; Othman, Zainal; Hafiz, Eliza; Hamid, Mohamad Shariff A

doi:10.17576/jsm-2020-4910-18

Cited by 7 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…18,19 In the present study, both groups showed significant improvements in pain, disability, and abdominal muscle endurance at weeks six and 12 (P<0.001). This is in agreement with Chan et al 20 study showed that a six-week duration of lumbar stability exercise is an effective intervention in chronic non-specific low back pain. This study followed the participants for 12 weeks and found 6% higher improvements in the LSETC group on the pain scale.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

The effects of lumbar stabilization exercises with and without jaw movements in non-specific low back pain (A randomized controlled trial)

Khan,

Hamayun zafar,

Syed Amir Gilani

et al. 2024

Pak J Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the added effect of jaw clenching on the efficacy of lumbar stabilization exercises to manage chronic non-specific low back pain. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Sindh Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (SIPM&R) Karachi from April 2021 to April 2023. Eighty patients with chronic non-specific low back pain participated in this study. Forty patients each were randomly allocated to the lumbar stability exercise (LSE) group’ and the lumbar stability exercise with teeth clenching (LSETC) group. Patients in both groups performed respective exercises twice weekly for 12 weeks. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and Pressure Biofeedback Unit (PBU) were used to assess pain, disability, and muscle endurance respectively. Data were collected at the baseline, after six weeks and 12 weeks of intervention. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Both groups showed statistically significant improvements in pain, disability, and muscle endurance. Upon further stratification, participants aged 20-30 years in the LSETC group showed significantly higher scores than the LSE group for NPRS, RMDQ, and PBU after 12 weeks. Overall, the LSETC group showed relatively higher improvement in mean scores for NPRS, RMDQ, and PBU than the LSE group. Conclusion: Lumbar stabilization exercises with and without jaw movement are effective for the treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain. The addition of teeth clenching enhanced the effectiveness of lumbar stability exercises, especially in young adults. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04801212), Prospectively registered on March 16, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.6.9208 How to cite this: Khan M, Zafar H, Gilani SA, Farooqui WA, Ahmad A. The effects of lumbar stabilization exercises with and without jaw movements in non-specific low back pain (A randomized controlled trial). Pak J Med Sci. 2024;40(6):1116-1121. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.6.9208 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

The effects of lumbar stabilization exercises with and without jaw movements in non-specific low back pain (A randomized controlled trial)

Khan,

Hamayun zafar,

Syed Amir Gilani

et al. 2024

Pak J Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Seven studies have found that CSE is more helpful than other therapy in relieving pain in persons with CLBP (Alkhathami et al, 2023;Andrusaitis et al, 2011;Khodadad et al, 2020;Kim et al, 2015;Rhee et al, 2012;Salik Sengul et al, 2021;Sarker et al, 2020). However, eight studies concluded that CSE was similarly effective in improving pain in patients with CLBP compared with other therapies (Alp et al, 2014;Alshehre et al, 2023;Chan et al, 2020;Hwangbo et al, 2015;Khodadad et al, 2020;Salavati et al, 2016;Ulger et al, 2023;H. Wang et al, 2023).…”

Section: Results Of Key Characteristics Of Included Research 421 Arti...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Core Stability Exercise on Functional Performance among Adults with Low Back Pain

Pipeng,

Zahari,

Azizan

et al. 2024

E-BPJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The influence of Core Stability Exercise (CSE) on functional performance in adults with Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) is a debated topic. This study aimed to explore CSE effects on functional performance in this demographic. English-language studies until October 2023 were systematically gathered from Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed, with PEDro scoring and adherence to PRISMA guidelines. Notably, CSE showed superiority over passive therapy in enhancing proprioception, as supported by one study. In conclusion, while CSE demonstrates proficiency in improving proprioception, its effects on aspects like pain, balance, motor control, functionality, metabolic capacity, and postural sway in CLBP vary.

show abstract

“…(2017) have reported that the Pilates exercise protocol has reinforced core muscle endurance and lumbar flexibility (38) . On one level, there have been no previous studies that draw a comparison between the effects of stabilization of Pilates exercises on spatiotemporal gait parameters.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lumbopelvic stabilization versus Pilates exercises on spatiotemporal gait parameters in chronic nonspecific low back pain

Elfeky¹,

Elhafez²,

Genedy³

et al. 2022

ijhs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim of the work: The purpose of the current study is to trace and investigate how lumbopelvic stabilization and Pilates exercises affect the spatiotemporal aspects of gait in persistent nonspecific low back pain cases (NS-CLBP). Methods: Patients with NS-CLBP (N=90) were randomly assigned to one of three groups: group A (stabilization + traditional therapy), group B (Pilates plus traditional therapy), and group C (conventional therapy) in a single-blinded randomized clinical trial with 12 treatments over six weeks. A Walkway pressure measurement system was used to determine both spatial and temporal parameters. The Visual Analog Scale, Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, Biering–Sorensen test, and trunk flexion endurance test were adopted successfully to assess pain, function, and isometric endurance of trunk extensor and flexor. Results: According to a cross-group analysis, a statistically significant effect was found when p = 0.001 and f-value = 3.12. Also, a statistically clear interaction was figured out between treatment and time when p = 0.0001 and f-value = 3.44. Following therapy, the Pilates group showed a decrease in temporal parameters, pain, and functional impairment, as well as an increase in cadence and velocity (p 0.05).

show abstract

The Short-Term Effects of Progressive vs. Conventional Core Stability Exercise in Rehabilitation of Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

The effects of lumbar stabilization exercises with and without jaw movements in non-specific low back pain (A randomized controlled trial)

The effects of lumbar stabilization exercises with and without jaw movements in non-specific low back pain (A randomized controlled trial)

Effects of Core Stability Exercise on Functional Performance among Adults with Low Back Pain

Lumbopelvic stabilization versus Pilates exercises on spatiotemporal gait parameters in chronic nonspecific low back pain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About