2018
DOI: 10.1137/17m1140571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Shifted Proper Orthogonal Decomposition: A Mode Decomposition for Multiple Transport Phenomena

Abstract: Transport-dominated phenomena provide a challenge for common modebased model reduction approaches. We present a model reduction method, which is suited for these kinds of systems. It extends the proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) by introducing time-dependent shifts of the snapshot matrix. The approach, called shifted proper orthogonal decomposition (sPOD), features a determination of the multiple transport velocities and a separation of these. One-and two-dimensional test examples reveal the good performan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
180
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
180
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the challenges in Galerkin projection is the deformation of POD modes. As recently discussed by Reiss et al 75 , transport-dominated phenomena are usually a challenge for modal methods, since their dynamics cannot be captured accurately by a few dominant spatial modes. If we include more number of modes to better recover the embedded structures in the underlying system, the computational expense increases and the ROM might not be efficient from practical point of view.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the challenges in Galerkin projection is the deformation of POD modes. As recently discussed by Reiss et al 75 , transport-dominated phenomena are usually a challenge for modal methods, since their dynamics cannot be captured accurately by a few dominant spatial modes. If we include more number of modes to better recover the embedded structures in the underlying system, the computational expense increases and the ROM might not be efficient from practical point of view.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the sPOD modes clearly reveal the front profiles of the different transports, whereas the POD is not suitable for identifying structures in this test case. In comparison to the heuristic sPOD algorithm proposed in [20], the new algorithm is based on a residual minimization and hence at least locally optimal. A drawback of the new algorithm is that it is more expensive than the POD and the original sPOD approach of [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where for the moment we assume that the shift frames ∆ are available or can be approximated before the optimization for the modes ψ and their time amplitudes α is carried out. Methods to estimate these shifts based on given snapshot data have been discussed in [20]. A crucial difference between (9) and (8) is that (9) is an unconstrained optimization problem without the orthonormality restriction for the modes ψ j .…”
Section: Optimal Spod Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easy to see that a linear projection of this solution to a low-dimensional basis would not yield a good approximation of the solution. Naturally, methods to remove translational symmetry [36,32,34] are being actively explored. This is also intimately related to the concept of displacement interpolation, a term we borrow from the optimal transport literature [40], in which one aims to minimize the Wasserstein distance, although we will not make the connection more explicit here.…”
Section: Displacement Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%