2023
DOI: 10.1017/ics.2023.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The shift towards an eco-welfare state: growing stronger together

Abstract: Poverty, inequality and climate change are profoundly interconnected issues and represent grave threats to the future of our planet and civilization. Failure in one will result in failure in the other; thus, government responses to such threats must be meticulously coordinated, especially across environmental and welfare state programs. In recent years, a growing body of research has examined the links between these two domains, lauding the eco-welfare state as a viable path forward. As the literature on the e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(110 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From an institutional perspective, a relatively recent academic debate has focused on the connections between the welfare state – defined as a state that aims to provide ‘decommodification’ and ‘destratification’, hence guaranteeing socially acceptable standards of living and (re)distributing resources and opportunities equally among the population (Esping-Andersen, 1990) - and the environmental (or eco) state – defined as ‘a state that possesses a significant set of institutions and practices dedicated to the management of the environment and societal–environmental interactions’ (Duit et al, 2015: 5). Besides studies highlighting their similarities and differences (Gough, 2016; Meadowcroft, 2005), some scholars have attempted to juxtapose the performance of the eco and welfare states, mapping so-called ‘worlds of eco-welfare states’ (Hasanaj, 2023; Zimmermann and Graziano, 2020). While some of these contributions (Koch and Fritz, 2014; Zimmermann and Graziano, 2020) found evidence to confirm a ‘synergy hypothesis’, whereby strong social-democratic welfare models should also perform strongly with respect to environmental protection (Dryzek et al, 2003), others instead rejected this idea (García-García et al, 2022).…”
Section: The State Of the Art: A Largely Uncharted Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From an institutional perspective, a relatively recent academic debate has focused on the connections between the welfare state – defined as a state that aims to provide ‘decommodification’ and ‘destratification’, hence guaranteeing socially acceptable standards of living and (re)distributing resources and opportunities equally among the population (Esping-Andersen, 1990) - and the environmental (or eco) state – defined as ‘a state that possesses a significant set of institutions and practices dedicated to the management of the environment and societal–environmental interactions’ (Duit et al, 2015: 5). Besides studies highlighting their similarities and differences (Gough, 2016; Meadowcroft, 2005), some scholars have attempted to juxtapose the performance of the eco and welfare states, mapping so-called ‘worlds of eco-welfare states’ (Hasanaj, 2023; Zimmermann and Graziano, 2020). While some of these contributions (Koch and Fritz, 2014; Zimmermann and Graziano, 2020) found evidence to confirm a ‘synergy hypothesis’, whereby strong social-democratic welfare models should also perform strongly with respect to environmental protection (Dryzek et al, 2003), others instead rejected this idea (García-García et al, 2022).…”
Section: The State Of the Art: A Largely Uncharted Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eversberg and Fritz, 2022; Otto and Gugushvili, 2020), the interconnectedness of welfare and environmental states (e.g. García-García et al, 2022; Hasanaj, 2023; Zimmermann and Graziano, 2020) and the growth dependency of current welfare systems (e.g. Büchs, 2021; Corlet Walker et al, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%