2016
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.1082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The shield effect: nuptial gifts protect males against pre-copulatory sexual cannibalism

Abstract: Several not mutually exclusive functions have been ascribed to nuptial gifts across different taxa. Although the idea that a nuptial prey gift may protect the male from pre-copulatory sexual cannibalism is attractive, it has previously been considered of no importance based on indirect evidence and rejected by experimental tests. We reinvestigated whether nuptial gifts may function as a shield against female attacks during mating encounters in the spider Pisaura mirabilis and whether female hunger influences t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that matings were initiated more frequently and more quickly when females were actively foraging (i.e., not satiated the previous day), suggesting that, in this case, males assessed the risk of cannibalism using cues associated with female foraging behaviour rather than perceived hunger levels. These results lend strong support to the idea that distraction is an important signal for mating initiation in cannibalistic taxa (Maxwell 1998; Bilde et al 2006; Uhl et al 2015; Toft and Albo 2016). However, it is likely that males pay attention to the entire predation sequence when timing their approach, with certain behavioural cues provoking greater response than others (Scardamaglia et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…We found that matings were initiated more frequently and more quickly when females were actively foraging (i.e., not satiated the previous day), suggesting that, in this case, males assessed the risk of cannibalism using cues associated with female foraging behaviour rather than perceived hunger levels. These results lend strong support to the idea that distraction is an important signal for mating initiation in cannibalistic taxa (Maxwell 1998; Bilde et al 2006; Uhl et al 2015; Toft and Albo 2016). However, it is likely that males pay attention to the entire predation sequence when timing their approach, with certain behavioural cues provoking greater response than others (Scardamaglia et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…In addition to food resources, we proposed that sexual selection plays an important role for which tactic a male employs (Ghislandi et al, 2014). We assume that post-copulatory sexual selection intensifies as the mating season progresses, because mated females become more resistant to additional matings (Halliday, 1983;Gabor & Halliday, 1997;Bateman et al, 2001;Tuni & Bilde, 2010), and this resistance may be overcome by males offering nuptial gifts (Albo et al, 2011b;Hendrickx et al, 2015;Toft & Albo, 2016). Indeed, males were increasingly more likely to carry a nuptial gift as the season progressed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Males always benefit from avoiding cannibalism prior to mating and will usually benefit from avoiding cannibalism following mating, particularly when it allows them to acquire additional mates [8]. Indeed, males appear to have evolved a variety of counter-adaptations to sexual cannibalism, such as feigning death [9], sedating females [10], tying up females in silk [11], and providing nuptial gifts [12]. Surprisingly, males of some species, instead of resisting sexual cannibalism, actually appear to facilitate their own cannibalism by females [13,14], resulting in a monogynous mating system (a mating system in which males mate with only one female but in which females may mate with more than one male).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%