Paradox and Power in Caring Leadership 2020
DOI: 10.4337/9781788975506.00015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The shepherd king and his flock: paradoxes of leadership and care in classical Greek philosophy

Abstract: The shepherd king and his flock: paradoxes of leadership and care in classical Greek philosophyWe bore in mind that, for example, cowherds are the rulers (archontes) of their cattle, that grooms are the rulers of horses, and that all those who are called herdsmen might reasonably be considered to be rulers of the animals they manage (epistatōsi).(Xenophon, Cyropaedia, 1.1.2) When Xenophon, the fourth-century BCE Athenian soldier and writer, and once one of Socrates' students, tried to explain the nature of lea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Caring too much can become overly interventionist (Tomkins and Simpson, 2015). It can result in leaders assuming, rather than finding out, what their followers need and want, depriving them of agency, identity and independence (Atack, 2020). Indeed, the assumption of followers' needs might even be seen as an abuse of power, inspiring Ladkin (2020) to reframe caring leadership away from 'doing unto others as you would have them do unto you' towards 'doing unto others as they themselves would want to be treated'.…”
Section: So Where Is Boris Johnson?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caring too much can become overly interventionist (Tomkins and Simpson, 2015). It can result in leaders assuming, rather than finding out, what their followers need and want, depriving them of agency, identity and independence (Atack, 2020). Indeed, the assumption of followers' needs might even be seen as an abuse of power, inspiring Ladkin (2020) to reframe caring leadership away from 'doing unto others as you would have them do unto you' towards 'doing unto others as they themselves would want to be treated'.…”
Section: So Where Is Boris Johnson?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Philosophical elaborations of caring leadership have drawn on Foucauldian ethics (Ladkin, 2018), Jungian archetypes (Gabriel, 2015), Heideggerian ontology (Tomkins and Simpson, 2015), evolutionary theory (Abreu Pederzini, 2020), and Classical understandings of the relationship between care and democracy (Atack, 2020) and care and national security (Lowrie, 2020). These have traced some of the power dynamics of caring leadership, focusing principally on the suggestion that care can be infantilising.…”
Section: Caring Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This risk revolves around a loss of autonomy and agency. For instance, Atack (2020) explores caring leadership in Classical Greece, where the analogy of the shepherd king and his flock exposes the crucial significance of distinguishing between followers’ assumed versus articulated needs, for the assumption of needs is seen as a potential abuse of power. Drawing on the more recent framing of psychoanalysis, Gabriel (2015: 329) highlights similarities between the overly caring parent and the overly caring leader: ‘As every caring parent knows, excessive caring can seriously inhibit the autonomy of followers, instilling dependence and inertia…At what point does caring turn into overprotection and cosseting?’…”
Section: Caring Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%