1987
DOI: 10.1016/s0901-5027(87)80113-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The sheep as a model for temporomandibular joint surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Porous SF cylinders of the four groups (Table 1) were distributed randomly to eight predefined metaphyseal or epiphyseal locations in long bones of the sheep, namely left and right proximal humerus, proximal femur, proximal tibia, and distal femur [22,24]. Therefore, two repetitions of each of the four treatment groups were implanted in each sheep.…”
Section: Scaffold Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Porous SF cylinders of the four groups (Table 1) were distributed randomly to eight predefined metaphyseal or epiphyseal locations in long bones of the sheep, namely left and right proximal humerus, proximal femur, proximal tibia, and distal femur [22,24]. Therefore, two repetitions of each of the four treatment groups were implanted in each sheep.…”
Section: Scaffold Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate the effect of the proposed processing parameters on the performance and biocompatibility of SF scaffolds in one single experiment, the sheep drill hole model was used, representing a relevant in vivo animal model that allows for the reduction in animal numbers but still satisfying statistical requirements [19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Condylar secondary cartilage has been shown to be sensitive to epigenetical factors such as hormonal influences (7) as well as mechanical loadings exerted by functional changes (8,9). His-tological investigations of temporomandibular joints from various mammalian groups, such as omnivores represented by humans (10,11), primates (12,13), ungulate herbivores such as sheep (14,15) and goat (16), as well as rodents such as guinea pigs (17) and rats (18,19), have failed to substantiate these proposed associations between biomechanical factors and microanatomy, and revealed the same general cellular organization of the condylar articular cartilage despite different macroanatomical features and functional performances. In all these investigated species, the condylar articular cartilage could be separated into a fibrous articular layer, a mitotic proliferative zone, followed by first hypertrophied cartilage cells and further down mineralized cartilage and, finally, a zone of endochondral bone formation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the primary plane of jaw motion in the goat and is the motion in which disc movements most resemble those observed in humans (Bosanquet and Goss 1987;Bifano et al 1994). This is the primary plane of jaw motion in the goat and is the motion in which disc movements most resemble those observed in humans (Bosanquet and Goss 1987;Bifano et al 1994).…”
Section: Monitoring and Control Of Jaw Movementmentioning
confidence: 87%