2010
DOI: 10.1080/08927021003720553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The shear viscosities of common water models by non-equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
44
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
11
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both of them, small and large amplitude points, were discarded from the viscosity linear relationship adjustment. 116 From Fig. S3b, † it can be observed that acceleration amplitude values higher than a 0 ¼ 0.11 nm ps À2 do not deviate the temperature considerably from the dotted line, in this same gure only one standard deviation within each viscosity point was plotted.…”
Section: Shear Viscositiesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Both of them, small and large amplitude points, were discarded from the viscosity linear relationship adjustment. 116 From Fig. S3b, † it can be observed that acceleration amplitude values higher than a 0 ¼ 0.11 nm ps À2 do not deviate the temperature considerably from the dotted line, in this same gure only one standard deviation within each viscosity point was plotted.…”
Section: Shear Viscositiesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…2d ) to avoid steric clash with bound NCoR peptide. We ran simulations at 37 °C (NMR was run at 25 °C) and with the TIP3P water model (TIP3P is much less viscous than actual water 39 ) to speed relaxation to a local or global energy minimum (i.e., stable conformation) given that this chain B-inactive conformation may be in a higher energy conformation. These simulations were allowed to run until reaching a structure that remained reasonably stable for at least 5 μs as judged by consistent helix 12 RMSD relative to the starting structure (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Wensink et al 18 calculated the value of the viscosity for the TIP4P model at T = 298.25 K and found the values μ = 0.464 ± 0.003 mPa (48.2% error) and μ = 0.479 ± 0.009 mPa (46.5% error) using the periodic perturbation method. Song and Dai 19 used the same method and found the values μ = 0.505 ± 0.007 mPa (43.6% error) and 17 used the Stokes-Einstein relation and reported only errors, which are between 30.3% and 52.3% for experimental and calculated values. The reference simulation performed using the method described in this article leads to a value for the viscosity: μ = 0.481 ± 0.015 mPa (46.3% error) and therefore similar to the results obtained by others using different methods.…”
Section: B Viscosity Of the Water Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%