1966
DOI: 10.1115/1.3625046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Shear Coefficient in Timoshenko’s Beam Theory

Abstract: The equations of Timoshenko’s beam theory are derived by integration of the equations of three-dimensional elasticity theory. A new formula for the shear coefficient comes out of the derivation. Numerical values of the shear coefficient are presented and compared with values obtained by other writers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
588
0
18

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,564 publications
(613 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
588
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the value k ¼ 5 6 provides a prediction always lower than the exact, at least over the range considered, with a maximum error of À2%. Experimental evidence in support of the value k ¼ 5ð1 þ nÞ=ð6 þ 5nÞ has recently been provided by Me´ndez-Sa´nchez et al [17], although they also note that a two-coefficient theory presented by Stephen and Levinson [18], and which incorporates both this, and Cowper's value [19] of k ¼ 10ð1 þ nÞ=ð12 þ 11nÞ, provides marginally better agreement with their experimental results.…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 47%
“…On the other hand, the value k ¼ 5 6 provides a prediction always lower than the exact, at least over the range considered, with a maximum error of À2%. Experimental evidence in support of the value k ¼ 5ð1 þ nÞ=ð6 þ 5nÞ has recently been provided by Me´ndez-Sa´nchez et al [17], although they also note that a two-coefficient theory presented by Stephen and Levinson [18], and which incorporates both this, and Cowper's value [19] of k ¼ 10ð1 þ nÞ=ð12 þ 11nÞ, provides marginally better agreement with their experimental results.…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 47%
“…The shear deformation coefficients are evaluated using an energy approach, instead of Timoshenko's [21] and Cowper's [22] definitions, for which several authors [23] have pointed out that one obtains unsatisfactory results or definitions given by other researchers [24,25], for which these factors take negative values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of a cross section on flutter stability is considered in Table 3, where values of a critical flutter load are presented with respect to the changes in the cross section type. Shear correction factor in circular cross section is a function of inner and outer radius of hollow beam (Cowper, 1966): Table 3: Effect of radius ratio on critical follower force of stubby and slender beams.…”
Section: L/h Present Methods Timoshenkomentioning
confidence: 99%