The ShaRInK framework: a holistic perspective on key categories of influences shaping individual perceptions of knowledge sharing

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to present a holistic framework, termed ShaRInK (Sharer, Relations, Institution, Knowledge), that depicts key categories of influences that shape individual perceptions of knowledge sharing within an organisational setting. Design/methodology/approach – An exploratory and qualitative case study strategy in which empirical data were gathered from 24 interviewees that were based in four different branches (i.e. China, The Netherlands, the UK and the USA) of a single information technology services organisation. Findings – The findings led to a holistic framework that depicts four key categories of influences that shape knowledge sharing from an individual perspective: attitudes and characteristics of the sharers, relations between the sharers, institutions which act as a united entity on sharer perceptions and knowledge itself. Furthermore, the four key influences not only shape knowledge sharing independently but are intertwined and have a synergistic effect. The ShaRInK framework is formed by combining these. Originality/value – The findings indicate that knowledge sharing from an individual-level perspective is a more complex phenomenon than currently portrayed in the literature. All four key influences, each being fundamentally different in nature, and their relationships should be taken into account. Equally, the ShaRInK framework can be applied by organisations when developing a knowledge-sharing strategy or auditing existing strategies.

Negotiate, reciprocate, or cooperate? The impact of exchange modes on inter-employee knowledge sharing

“…The theory suggests that intentions to engage in a particular behavior are determined by an attitude toward this behavior. The existence of this relationship has been confirmed with respect to a variety of behaviors, including knowledge sharing (Lin, 2007;Schauer et al, 2015). According to Bock et al (2005), knowledge sharing attitude has an impact on two different types of intentions: intentions to share tacit knowledge and intentions to share explicit knowledge.…”

Building social capital and learning relationships through knowledge sharing: a social network approach of management students’ cases

“…Although the theory and concept of social capital is widely recognized (Kadushin, 2012), and social network analysis is becoming popular as a method for analyzing social networks, its application to the empirical research context of knowledge sharing has been rare. Although scholars started contending the importance of examining social interactions and relational aspects of knowledge sharing (Coradi et al , 2015; Schauer, et al , 2015; Khedhaouria and Jamal, 2015), few studies discuss how to select which attributes and types of interactions or relationships would best serve as antecedents or processes of knowledge sharing.…”

Understanding Knowledge Sharing in an Organization

“…Barriers and facilitators constitute the core themes within knowledge sharing literature (Schauer, Vasconcelos & Sen, 2015). This is due to the need to understand the factors that influence knowledge sharing for its stimulation and to manage knowledge sharing processes more effectively (Ma, Huang, Wu, Dong & Qi, 2014).…”