2002
DOI: 10.1080/09638280110066235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors

Abstract: The synthesis of evidence and theories suggests that successful integration of assistive technology into daily lives requires potential device users to explore: (1) the meanings they assign to devices; (2) their expectations of assistive technology; (3) the anticipated social costs; and (4) ways to understand that disability is one, but not the defining, feature of one's identity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
128
1
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
7
128
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A review of the personalised meanings attributed to AT suggest that successful integration of AT is dependent on the individual meaning ascribed to the AT which in turn is influenced by psychosocial and cultural issues 52 .…”
Section: Time Alonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of the personalised meanings attributed to AT suggest that successful integration of AT is dependent on the individual meaning ascribed to the AT which in turn is influenced by psychosocial and cultural issues 52 .…”
Section: Time Alonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Becoming accustomed to an ATD is a process in which the users' own perception of needs, as well as social and physical contexts, influence the experience [16]. The meaning attributed to ATDs is influenced by the users' perceived difficulties, perceived faith in being well-served by the device, and perception regarding whether it corresponds to or challenges their self-image [17]. The ATD is considered both an instrumental object and an object that bears symbolic meaning for the user.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issues of how participant wellbeing would be safeguarded and the avoidance of any emotional distress were discussed, particularly given the potential role of participation in provoking participants to re-examine their physical or cognitive capacities or to become aware of the progress of conditions, an issue highlighted by Pape et al [30] and reflected in the submission as follows:…”
Section: Developing the Brainable Project Ethical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%