2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2015.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The shape of the Venusian bow shock at solar minimum and maximum: Revisit based on VEX observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, it is not so surprising that the terminator shock distances observed by VEX are quite different. According to VEX measurements the bow shock is located further out during solar maximum, but the terminator shock distance of 2.14 R V is comparable with the solar minimum value determined by PVO (Shan et al 2015). However, the solar maximum experienced by VEX was very weak, as inferred from the F10.7 flux and sunspot number, and the solar minimum extremely long and weak.…”
Section: Location and Structure Of The Bow Shockmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, it is not so surprising that the terminator shock distances observed by VEX are quite different. According to VEX measurements the bow shock is located further out during solar maximum, but the terminator shock distance of 2.14 R V is comparable with the solar minimum value determined by PVO (Shan et al 2015). However, the solar maximum experienced by VEX was very weak, as inferred from the F10.7 flux and sunspot number, and the solar minimum extremely long and weak.…”
Section: Location and Structure Of The Bow Shockmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…However, the solar maximum experienced by VEX was very weak, as inferred from the F10.7 flux and sunspot number, and the solar minimum extremely long and weak. VEX observations show that the terminator shock distance changes from 2.08 to 2.14 R V and the subsolar shock distance from 1.36 to 1.46 R V during the solar cycle in the model used by Shan et al (2015).…”
Section: Location and Structure Of The Bow Shockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also the reason for the increase in ion cyclotron waves upstream of Venus's bow shock as shown by Delva et al (2015). The increased ionization also causes the bow shock and ionosphere to move outward (Alexander and Russell, 1985;Shan et al, 2015), albeit Slavin et al (1980) argue that charge exchange at low altitudes near the ionopause is causing the shock to move closer at solar minimum. The MM wave effect is to balance magnetic pressure B 2 /2µ 0 and plasma pressure n i k B T ⊥,i , and the instability is driven by the temperature anisotropy of the ions (see Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Delva et al, 2015), and thus the bow shock and ionopause move outward from Venus (e.g. Alexander and Russell, 1985;Shan et al, 2015).…”
Section: Statistical Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistical results, see Table , also show that there are magnetic north‐south asymmetries in all the regions, and the scales of the magnetic north‐south asymmetries are (0.114 ± 0.056) R V or 5% in the near‐subsolar BS, (0.148 ± 0.107) R V or 7% in the terminator BS, and (0.181 ± 0.106) R V or 9% in the tail BS; here we take the average shock terminator distance as 2.098 R V [ Chai et al , ]. These asymmetries may at least partly account for the large deviation of BS location from the averaged shape recently showed by Shan et al [].…”
Section: Sza‐dependent Asymmetriesmentioning
confidence: 99%