2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2009.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The shape distribution of boulders on Asteroid 25143 Itokawa: Comparison with fragments from impact experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
30
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
7
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6. If we compare the 103P b/a value with those derived by Michikami et al (2010) (Michikami et al 2010). On the contrary, the 0.58 b/a value indicates that the 103P boulders ≥30 m are characterized by more elongated shapes compared with collisional laboratory fragments, therefore, suggesting a possible different origin.…”
Section: The Shape Distribution Of Boulders ≥30 M On 103pmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6. If we compare the 103P b/a value with those derived by Michikami et al (2010) (Michikami et al 2010). On the contrary, the 0.58 b/a value indicates that the 103P boulders ≥30 m are characterized by more elongated shapes compared with collisional laboratory fragments, therefore, suggesting a possible different origin.…”
Section: The Shape Distribution Of Boulders ≥30 M On 103pmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The aim of this approach is to determine the b/a ratio and compare that with the boulders studied on asteroids 25 143 Itokawa and 433 Eros, as in Michikami et al (2010). This was only possible for boulders ≥30 m. As a result, in the case of smaller boulders, the ∼3 m/px scale, coupled with the use of 103P deconvolved images , makes the identification of the b/a ratio extremely difficult, and hence, only provides a confident measure of the maximum dimension of boulders.…”
Section: Dataset and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In laboratory-size impact experiments, Capaccioni et al (1984) with b /a = 0.77 ± 0.11 (Capaccioni et al 1984). While boulders larger than R = 5 m on asteroid Itokawa show a slightly different value of b /a = 0.62 ± 0.19, Michikami et al (2010) argue that this might be due to the sorting by granular motion that has evidently been processing the interior of Itokawa (Miyamoto et al 2007). The effect of elongated shapes to the rubble pile simulant model is not clear.…”
Section: Treatment Of Interlocking Pebblesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Therefore, the major constituents of a rubble pile asteroid are themselves fragments of a collision, and their size distribution and shape will be a result of the disruption event that destroyed the parent body. In the case of asteroids Eros and Itokawa, Michikami, Nakamura & Hirata (2010) endorsed this scenario by showing that the shapes of boulders found on the surface match those of fragments of impact experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%