The SF-36 Offers a Strong Measure of Mental Health Symptoms in Survivors of Acute Respiratory Failure. A Tri-National Analysis

Abstract

Rationale: Survivors of acute respiratory failure commonly experience long-term psychological sequelae and impaired quality of life. For researchers interested in general mental health, using multiple condition-specific instruments may be unnecessary and inefficient when using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF)-36, a recommended outcome measure, may suffice. However, relationships between the SF-36 scores and commonly used measures of psychological symptoms in acute survivors of respiratory failure are unknown.Objectives: Our objective is to examine the relationship of the SF-36 mental health domain (MH) and mental health component summary (MCS) scores with symptoms of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) evaluated using validated psychological instruments.Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 1,229 participants at 6-and 12-month follow-up assessment using data from five studies from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia.Measurements and Main Results: Symptoms were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Depression Anxiety Stress Scales, the Davidson Trauma Scale, Impact of Event Scale (IES), and IES-Revised (IES-R). At 6-month assessment there were moderate to strong correlations of the SF-36 MH scores with HADS depression and anxiety symptoms (r = 20.74 and 20.79) and with IES-R PTSD symptoms (r = 20.60) in the pooled analyses. Using the normalized population mean of 50 on the SF-36 MH domain score as a cut-off, positive predictive values were 16 and 55% for substantial depression; 20 and 68% for substantial anxiety (Depression Anxiety Stress Scales and HADS, respectively); and 40, 44, and 67% for substantial PTSD symptoms (IES-R, IES, and Davidson Trauma Scale, respectively). Negative predictive values were high. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of the SF-36 MH score was high for depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptoms (0.88, 0.91, and 0.84, respectively). All results were consistent for the MCS, across the individual studies, and for the 12-month assessment.Conclusions: For researchers interested in general mental health status, the SF-36 MH or MCS offers a strong measure of psychological symptoms prevalent among survivors of acute respiratory failure. For researchers interested in specific conditions, validated psychological instruments should be considered.

Neighbourhood identification and mental health: How social identification moderates the relationship between socioeconomic disadvantage and health

“…Scores were transformed so that the resulting scale ranged from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better mental health. The MHI-5 is closely associated with other widely used indicators of depression and anxiety, and a cut-off score of 52 has been suggested as a clinically meaningful indicator of major depression (Crosier, Butterworth, & Rodgers, 2007;Pfoh et al, 2016;Rumpf, Meyer & Hapke & John, 2001).…”

Quality of life improves with individualized home-based exercises in critical care survivors

“…Physiologically, exercises increase the release of endorphins which in turn improves circulation and has an impact on a hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis which collectively improves the physiological reactivity to stress. [ 9 ] Hence, this could have improved the scores of MCS which corresponds to the anxiety and depression status (r = 0.88)[ 10 ] of the participants in the study group. Another reason for this improvement could be the better physical functional status of the patients in the study group.…”

Improving outcomes after critical illness: harder than we thought!

“…In a recent study evaluating measures of health-related QoL, substantial gaps in the coverage of important aspects of survivorship were reported, including finances, place of residence, appearance and personality [12]. The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) demonstrated a moderate to strong correlation with anxiety and depression symptoms from specific psychological screening tools, but with a low specificity for mental health disorders [13]. The authors noted that because negative predictive values were high, the best use of the SF-36 in studies is to help rule out patients with mental health disorders.…”