2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00702-016-1523-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The sexually dimorphic impact of maltreatment on cortical thickness, surface area and gyrification

Abstract: An extensive literature has detailed how maltreatment experience impacts brain structure in children and adolescents. However, there is a dearth of studies on the influence of maltreatment on surface based indices, and to date no study has investigated how sex influences the impact of maltreatment on cortical thickness, surface area and local gyrification. We investigated sex differences in these measures of cortical structure in a large community sample of children aged 10–14 years (n = 122) comprising 62 chi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
19
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
(153 reference statements)
5
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike cortical thickness, abuse did not predict differences in cortical surface area. These findings are consistent with the only prior two studies of cortical thickness and surface area in overlapping samples of maltreated and nonmaltreated adolescents, which found perturbations in the PFC for thickness but not surface area (Kelly et al., , ). Similar findings of reduced thickness but comparable surface area have been observed in studies of neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism (Wallace et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Unlike cortical thickness, abuse did not predict differences in cortical surface area. These findings are consistent with the only prior two studies of cortical thickness and surface area in overlapping samples of maltreated and nonmaltreated adolescents, which found perturbations in the PFC for thickness but not surface area (Kelly et al., , ). Similar findings of reduced thickness but comparable surface area have been observed in studies of neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism (Wallace et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This region is the most consistently associated with maltreatment in previous research (De Brito et al., ; Edmiston et al., ; Hanson et al., ; Kelly et al., ; Lim et al., ). However, unlike most prior studies that relied on measures of cortical volume, this study shows that OFC differences are specific to cortical thickness, replicating findings from prior studies in a sample of adolescents with verified maltreatment exposure (Kelly et al., , ). Thus, the current findings reflect an important contribution to the maltreatment literature as the first independent replication of prior findings of reduced OFC thickness in abused adolescents.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…47 Prior structural MRI studies find associations with maltreatment exposure in the vmPFC, 12,17,22,23,48,49 lateral OFC, 17,19 anterior and posterior cingulate cortices, 17,23,49 ventrolateral PFC (including inferior frontal gyrus [IFG]), 19 dorsolateral PFC (including middle and superior frontal gyri), 17,22,23,49 insular cortex, 19,23 parahippocampal gyrus, 19 temporal pole, 17,22 and lateral temporal cortex (spanning inferior, middle, and superior temporal gyri). 12,17,19,22,23,48 Based on these prior pediatric morphometry findings and the volumetric maltreatment meta-analysis by Lim et al, 19 we selected ROIs in these prefrontal and temporal cortical regions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%