2021
DOI: 10.1080/15564886.2021.1974994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sexual Grooming Scale – Victim Version: The Development and Pilot Testing of a Measure to Assess the Nature and Extent of Child Sexual Grooming

Abstract: Sexual grooming has been deemed an integral component of child sexual abuse (CSA). However, the nature and extent of sexual grooming remains understudied in large part because an empirically-validated scale for child sexual grooming has yet to be developed. We developed the Sexual Grooming Scale -Victim Version (SGS-V) to assess the stages and behaviors described in the content-validated Sexual Grooming Model from a victim's perspective. The SGS-V was pilot tested with 115 adult victims of CSA. Overall, result… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We utilized our pilot data to assess the most important areas of feasibility as it relates to the PIDS . Specifically, we assessed feasibility in terms of implementation (i.e., ability to administer and gather data from a sample of the general population) and limited-efficacy testing (i.e., whether the measure obtained the designed outcome; Bowen et al, 2009; Kasturi et al, 2018; Ruel et al, 2016; Russell et al, 2018; Winters & Jeglic, 2021). First, the PIDS was easily implemented in an online, self-report survey format, as all 100 participants responded to the items on the measure and the appropriate skip logic for questions was administered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We utilized our pilot data to assess the most important areas of feasibility as it relates to the PIDS . Specifically, we assessed feasibility in terms of implementation (i.e., ability to administer and gather data from a sample of the general population) and limited-efficacy testing (i.e., whether the measure obtained the designed outcome; Bowen et al, 2009; Kasturi et al, 2018; Ruel et al, 2016; Russell et al, 2018; Winters & Jeglic, 2021). First, the PIDS was easily implemented in an online, self-report survey format, as all 100 participants responded to the items on the measure and the appropriate skip logic for questions was administered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to meeting and accessing their victims online, technology can also be used as part of the sexual-grooming process for offline sexual abuse. In-person child sexual grooming has been defined as “the deceptive process used by sexual abusers to facilitate sexual contact with a minor while simultaneously avoiding detection.” [ 27 ]. Winters and colleagues [ 28 ] identified 42 distinct sexual-grooming behaviors that have been identified by experts to constitute behaviors indicative of sexual grooming (see [ 28 ] for review).…”
Section: The Role Of Technology In Offline Sexual Abusementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saat ini marak terjadi salah satu bentuk kejahatan seksual dengan objek anak -anak yaitu Child sexual abuse. Anak dan remaja rentan menjadi korban kejahatan karena dianggap pribadi yang lemah, pasalnya pelaku tidak jarang ancaman dapat membuat korban tak berdaya itu disebut (Winters & Jeglic, 2016, 2022 Kondisi itu menyebabkan korban terdominasi dan mengalami kesulitan untuk mengungkapnya. Akan tetapi, pada kasus child sexual grooming pelaku melakukan aksinya tanpa kekerasan, tetapi dengan menggunakan manipulasi psikologi dimana anak ditipu untuk dapat mengikuti keinginan pelaku.…”
Section: Kekerasan Dan Kejahatan Seksual Pada Anakunclassified