2012
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Serial Engagement Model 17 Years After: From TCR Triggering to Immunotherapy

Abstract: More than 15 years ago the serial engagement model was proposed as an attempt to solve the low affinity/high sensitivity paradox of TCR antigen recognition. Since then, the model has undergone ups and downs marked by the technical and conceptual advancements made in the field of T lymphocyte activation. Here, I describe the development of the model and survey recent literature providing evidence either for or against the idea that serial TCR/pMHC engagement might contribute to T lymphocyte activation. I also d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5) show precisely the opposite pattern; i.e., the CD4-35-17b CAR (with a linker sufficiently long to enable bispecific binding) was consistently less potent than the CD4-10-17b CAR (with a linker too short for bispecific binding). These findings are consistent with the requirement for serial TCR/peptide-MHC engagement for optimal functionality, as originally proposed (68) and subsequently expanded to include influences of cytoskeletal interactions that modulate cellular dynamics at the immunological synapse (69,70). Current models emphasize the importance of rapid dissociation and reformation of TCR-peptide/MHC bonds; moreover, they highlight the reduced sensitivity to low antigen densities associated with unnaturally high binding affinities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…5) show precisely the opposite pattern; i.e., the CD4-35-17b CAR (with a linker sufficiently long to enable bispecific binding) was consistently less potent than the CD4-10-17b CAR (with a linker too short for bispecific binding). These findings are consistent with the requirement for serial TCR/peptide-MHC engagement for optimal functionality, as originally proposed (68) and subsequently expanded to include influences of cytoskeletal interactions that modulate cellular dynamics at the immunological synapse (69,70). Current models emphasize the importance of rapid dissociation and reformation of TCR-peptide/MHC bonds; moreover, they highlight the reduced sensitivity to low antigen densities associated with unnaturally high binding affinities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The kinetic proofreading model (61), for example, proposed that the TCR needs to undergo a series of intermediate steps before being triggered so that the overall response depends on the TCR-pMHC dissociation time. Other models propose an optimal dwell time for TCR-pMHC interactions (62) or serial engagement of different TCRs by the same pMHC (57,63). In all of these models, the intermediate steps are necessary for antigen discrimination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model rests on evidence that many TCRs on a single T cell are downregulated in the presence of small numbers of pMHC molecules. Serial engagement has morphed over years to incorporate arguments germane to 2D vs. 3D apparent binding kinetics (77), rationalizing the requirements for optimal TCR affinity to avoid interactions that are too strong or too weak to achieve repeat binding and sustained T-cell signaling (18). Liu et al (19) suggested that serial engagement is occurring through early and rapidly accumulated bond lifetimes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, T cells confronting "weakly" interacting ligands are able to sense and discriminate antigens with exquisite specificity, even detecting single-amino acid differences between two peptides bound to the same MHC allele product (16). A serial engagement process where a single (or low copy number) antigenic pMHC binds and unbinds multiple receptors (hundreds) on a T cell to amplify and sustain its activation has been proposed to generate signaling through fleeting encounters, including those important for antitumor immunity (17,18). The original concept of serial engagement (or serial triggering) was based on reutilization of pMHC over a period of hours that has been recently redefined to encompass shorter cycles of TCR stimulation over a period of seconds (19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%