“…The clinical diagnosis for AMI is conducted using electrocardiography (ECG), coronary angiography, and assessment of biomarker levels. In contrast to the low accuracy of ECG, with 57% of patients diagnosed correctly, and utilizing the contrast agent in coronary angiography, which made this method invasive and time-consuming, the cTnI blood biomarker has been established as an extremely specific and sensitive measurement for a precise assessment of the progression of AMI disease. − As a result, a sensitive and simple method for detecting cTnI is extremely valuable for AMI patients’ early detection and critical treatment. − Nowadays, the primary method for detecting cTnI is based on the antigen–antibody interaction as an immunosensor − or DNA binding as an aptasensor. − Despite their high sensitivity and selectivity, immunosensors have several limitations, including low stability at high temperatures, a long period of the immune reaction, high antibody production costs, and the difficulty of chemically modifying antibodies for biological detection. − Target-binding aptamers with resistance to harsh conditions, ease of chemical synthesis, and high specific affinity for fast-capturing cTnI have been developed as alternatives to antibodies. , By using the systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) technique, Ban and colleagues developed extremely sensitive and selective single-stranded DNA aptamers against cTnI . Studies revealed that compared to the anti-cTnI antibody, Tro4 and Tro6 aptamers exhibited superior binding abilities to cTnI, and their dissociation constants were lower than those of the anti-cTnI antibody .…”