1996
DOI: 10.1056/nejm199605233342102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sequencing of Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy after Conservative Surgery for Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Abstract: This study suggests that for patients ar substantial risk for systemic metastases, it is preferable to give a 12-week course of chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy, rather than radiation therapy followed by chemotherapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
166
2
9

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 409 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
11
166
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with [1], which shows the superiority of SCR over SRC for breast cancer patients receiving conservative surgery who are at substantial risk for systematic metastasis.…”
Section: Ulaxdl S Li"lps -^-------Lr_----------supporting
confidence: 89%
“…This result is consistent with [1], which shows the superiority of SCR over SRC for breast cancer patients receiving conservative surgery who are at substantial risk for systematic metastasis.…”
Section: Ulaxdl S Li"lps -^-------Lr_----------supporting
confidence: 89%
“…28 This effect, for example, would not diminish the action of chemotherapy in this region, since systemic treatment tends to be offered to the patients prior to radiotherapy. 29 On the assumption that the IMC incidental irradiation has a therapeutic impact, an interesting note is that precisely the group that received the higher doses to the IMC comprises mastectomy patients, regardless of whether an immediate reconstruction was performed or not. These patients usually have more advanced disease, which might translate into a higher risk of relapse at the IMC, 30 and would so benefit from this approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The achievement of negative margins is also of importance because a higher number of operations to obtain negative margins results in a greater volume of tissue excised and a poorer cosmetic result [9,10,26,27]. In some series, the re-excision rate to obtain negative margins can be as high as 69% [28]. In the current study, patients in the AC group had a rate of close (Ͻ1 mm) or positive margins double that of those who underwent PC (46% versus 23%; p ϭ .04) ( Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%