1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0739(199911)13:11<837::aid-aoc924>3.0.co;2-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The separation of dimethylarsinic acid, methylarsonous acid, methylarsonic acid, arsenate and dimethylarsinous acid on the Hamilton PRP-X100 anion-exchange column

Abstract: In order to separate the potential arsenite metabolites methylarsonous acid and dimethylarsinous acid from arsenite, arsenate, methylarsonic acid and dimethylarsinic acid, the pH‐dependent retention behaviour of all six arsenic compounds was studied on a Hamilton PRP‐X100 anion‐exchange column with 30 mM phosphate buffers (pH 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9) containing 20% (v/v) methanol as mobile phase and employing an inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer (ICP–AES) as the arsenic‐specific detector. Baseli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(34 reference statements)
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Greater concentrations of one or more compounds led to peak overlapping. This confirms the results published by Gailer and co-workers, 10,11 who studied the separation of anionic arsenic species on the PRP X100 column in dependence of pH and phosphate concentration of the eluent. The main difference between carbonate and phosphate buffer was reversal of the elution order of DMA red and As(V).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Greater concentrations of one or more compounds led to peak overlapping. This confirms the results published by Gailer and co-workers, 10,11 who studied the separation of anionic arsenic species on the PRP X100 column in dependence of pH and phosphate concentration of the eluent. The main difference between carbonate and phosphate buffer was reversal of the elution order of DMA red and As(V).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Storage of the extract resulted in an increased chromatographic recovery (Table 3) ( Table 5). The ability of CuCl/HCl to destroy arsenic-protein complexes 11 was also tested. The wool extract was mixed with 0.2 M CuCl/0.2 M HCl solution at a ratio of 1 : 10 and heated for 5 h at 37 • C. This improved the total recovery of arsenic by about 20% (Table 3).…”
Section: Arsenic Species In Water Extracts Of Woolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 In addition, investigations of the pH-dependent retention behaviour on reversed-phase and anion-exchange HPLC columns can provide very useful information about the protonation/deprotonation behaviour of arsenic compounds whose solution chemistry is not well understood. 9,10 Similarly, an appropriately chosen chromatographic technique should provide proof of the additional negative charge on [(GS) 2 AsSe] À as compared with GSSG. The additional proof of two GSH molecules being attached to the arsenicselenium moiety of [(GS) 2 AsSe] À would require a chromatographic separation of [(GS) 2 AsSe] À from the by-product, GSSG (Eqn [1]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reaction mixtures were incubated at 37 °C for 2 h, and then terminated by adding H 2 O 2 to a final concentration of 3% to release the arsenicals from proteins and to oxidize all arsenic metabolites to pentavalency [16], [30]. 20 µl aliquots of the samples were separated on an anion-exchange column (PRP X-100 250 mm×4.6 mm i.d., 5 µm, Hamilton) by HPLC and analyzed by ICP-MS (Elan 9000, PerkinElmer) with the flow rate of 1.0 ml/min at room temperature [31]-[33]. The arsenical compounds were eluted with the mobile phase of 12 mM (NH 4 ) 2 HPO 4 , the pH of which was adjusted to 6.0 with H 3 PO 4 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%