Word Stress 2014
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139600408.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The separation of accent and rhythm: evidence from StressTyp

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In many languages with iterative stress, the direction of primary-stress alignment coincides with the origin of foot iteration, and the primary stress occupies a foot type that looks the same as non-primary stress feet (Hammond 1985a, b, Hayes 1995. But asymmetries between primary and non-primary stresses are also robustly attested, as found, for example, in the work of Odden (1979), Bailey (1995), Hayes (1995), Hurch (1996), McGarrity (2003) and Goedemans & van der Hulst (2014). This paper considers the implications of this empirical diversity (which will be reviewed in detail in §2) specifically for the theory of primary stress, and more generally for metrical and prosodic theory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In many languages with iterative stress, the direction of primary-stress alignment coincides with the origin of foot iteration, and the primary stress occupies a foot type that looks the same as non-primary stress feet (Hammond 1985a, b, Hayes 1995. But asymmetries between primary and non-primary stresses are also robustly attested, as found, for example, in the work of Odden (1979), Bailey (1995), Hayes (1995), Hurch (1996), McGarrity (2003) and Goedemans & van der Hulst (2014). This paper considers the implications of this empirical diversity (which will be reviewed in detail in §2) specifically for the theory of primary stress, and more generally for metrical and prosodic theory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In words of four or more syllables F0 starts high on the initial syllable and falls to the second syllable, but the difference in F0 between the first and second syllables is not statistically significant (four syllable words: p = 0.5; five syllable words: p > 0.1, six syllable words: p > 0.1). High F0 found on the initial syllable in words of four to six syllables is part of the rhythmic pattern [25], [26] found in longer words, which manifests itself in Georgian as alternation in rising and falling F0.…”
Section: Initial Syllablementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Such systems are also referred to as 'count systems' (van der Hulst 1996), and argued to be typologically rare (constituting only 8% of the 180 languages surveyed in Goedemans & van der Hulst 2014: 130). In contrast to this type, van der Hulst forwards a Primary Accent First (PAF) model (van der Hulst 1984, Goedemans & van der Hulst 2014, involving top-down parsing. Under this model, primary accent is independently assigned first and footing/rhythm is established only afterwards, either parasitic on the location of primary accent (i.e.…”
Section: Iterative Feet and Primary Accentmentioning
confidence: 99%