1991
DOI: 10.1590/s0036-46651991000400006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The sensitivity, specificity and efficiency values of some serological tests used in the diagnosis of paracoccidioidomycosis

Abstract: This work reports on the results of double immunodiffusion (ID), counterimmunoelectrophoresis (CIE), complement fixation (CF) and indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) techniques in the serodiagnosis of paracoccidioidomycosis. The study was undertaken on four groups of individuals: 46 patients with untreated paracoccidioidomycosis, 22 patients with other deep mycoses, 30 with other infectious diseases (tuberculosis and cutaneous leishmaniasis) and 47 blood donors as negative controls. Data were obtained using Para… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
1
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
47
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, despite its low cost and simplicity, several studies have demonstrated the occurrence of false-negative results with this method (8,10,11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, despite its low cost and simplicity, several studies have demonstrated the occurrence of false-negative results with this method (8,10,11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The immunodiffusion (ID) test is one of the most widely used techniques due to the simplicity and low costs involved in its execution. The ID test is highly specific (about 100%), but false-negative results are not rare due to a sensitivity of 85 to 90% (8,10,11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like in ID test, the antigens used varied from laboratory to laboratory, and they are extracts from sonicated yeast cell suspensions, exocellular antigens from yeast or mycelial cultures, cell-free antigens obtained from yeast cells, and cross-reactions are due to the use of unfractionated antigens. Counter-immunoelectrophoresis is regarded as having a sensitivity equal to or slightly greater than that provided by ID [22]. Some authors related sensitivity between 77% and 97% and specificity at least 95%.…”
Section: Counter-immunoelectrophoresis (Cie)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitations of these tests include (i) cross-reactivity to other mycotic disorders, mainly histoplasmosis, and (ii) difficulties in standardization of the various tests and reagents (21,33,46,60). Hence, attempts to eliminate these problems include the examination of purified and well-characterized antigens derived from P. brasiliensis.…”
Section: Paracoccidioidomycosismentioning
confidence: 99%