1970
DOI: 10.1099/00221287-61-2-197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sensitivity of Gram-negative Bacteria, Recovered from Aerosols, to Lysozyme and Other Hydrolytic Enzymes

Abstract: SUMMARYThe susceptibility of five strains of bacteria, recovered after storage in the aerosol state, to certain hydrolytic enzymes has been examined. Aerosolized Escherichia coli organisms, strains B and JEPP, rapidly became susceptible to the bactericidal effects of lysozyme, ribonuclease, deoxyribonuclease and trypsin. E. coZi strain COMMUNE and Serratia marcescens strain 8 UK organisms remained insensitive to all four enzymes, Aerobacter aerogenes strain H organisms developed sensitivity to lysozyme only. R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lysozyme causes degradation of the mucopeptide layer, but in gram-negative bacteria this layer lies beneath the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) layer of the cell wall and usually remains inaccessible to lysozyme action (4,5). However, once this LPS layer is removed or undergoes some steric or chemical change, lysozyme is able to hydrolyze mucopeptide (6,7,10). The lysozyme susceptibility of the freeze-injured S. anatum cells may have been due to some alteration in the LPS layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lysozyme causes degradation of the mucopeptide layer, but in gram-negative bacteria this layer lies beneath the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) layer of the cell wall and usually remains inaccessible to lysozyme action (4,5). However, once this LPS layer is removed or undergoes some steric or chemical change, lysozyme is able to hydrolyze mucopeptide (6,7,10). The lysozyme susceptibility of the freeze-injured S. anatum cells may have been due to some alteration in the LPS layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aerosol generation and sampling prior to microbiological analysis are conducted for a range of bioaerosol-related research activities (e.g., determination of aerosol decay rates and inhalational infectious dose, efficacy of decontamination strategies, and evaluation of bioaerosol sampling technologies). These dynamic processes can cause damage due to shear forces acting on the microbial cells ( 12 27 ). Table 1 outlines some major aerosol generators and samplers used in aerobiological studies and their operating mechanisms.…”
Section: Aerosol Generation Sampling and Postprocessing Consideratimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The poor recovery of C. jejuni (significantly lower than 100%) is probably because the aerosolization was done in an isolator with an oxygen content similar to that of ambient air, where C. jejuni cannot survive well as it is a micro-aerophilic bacterial species (Goodhew et al 1988). Furthermore, the outer membranes of Gram-negative bacteria are more susceptible to rupture during aerosolization (Hambleton 1970). M. synoviae, the bacterial species without cell wall, was not affected by aerosolization stress.…”
Section: Effect Of Pre-sampling Process On Bacterialmentioning
confidence: 99%