1978
DOI: 10.1136/vr.103.19.420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The sensitivity and specificity of various tuberculin tests using bovine PPD and other tuberculins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

5
75
0
4

Year Published

1984
1984
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
75
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…6,8 The sensitivity of the various tuberculin tests ranges between 68.6% and 91.2% and the specificity between 75.5% and 98.8%. 6 These values suggest that the efficacy of any intradermal tuberculin test in control and/or eradication programs is limited. Direct diagnostic methods based on detection of the agent have been used to confirm TB in tissues collected at postmortem examinations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6,8 The sensitivity of the various tuberculin tests ranges between 68.6% and 91.2% and the specificity between 75.5% and 98.8%. 6 These values suggest that the efficacy of any intradermal tuberculin test in control and/or eradication programs is limited. Direct diagnostic methods based on detection of the agent have been used to confirm TB in tissues collected at postmortem examinations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 1917, the tuberculin test has been used for bovine TB screening in live cattle in the USA. 6,8 The sensitivity of the various tuberculin tests ranges between 68.6% and 91.2% and the specificity between 75.5% and 98.8%. 6 These values suggest that the efficacy of any intradermal tuberculin test in control and/or eradication programs is limited.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tuberculin used for the skin test is a purified protein derivative (PPD) prepared from culture filtrate of a laboratory strain of M. bovis (Francis et al, 1978). This test, based on the measurement of cellular immune response, can be conducted by inoculation into either the caudal fold near of the base of the tail or in the shoulder, both as a single The different susceptible animal species may act either as maintenance host (reservoir) or as nonmaintenance host (spillover) (Aranaz et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors include (but are not limited to) special nursing skill requirements for placement and reading, variability in operator placement and reading, cross-reactivity among mycobacterial species (including M. avium and M. bovis BCG), the need for the patient to return in 48 to 72 h for a reading, and the modulation of the skin response due to underlying illness or immunosuppression (6,28). Although the specificity of a significant positive test exceeds 95% in cattle, the sensitivity of the test in both animals and humans may be less than 75% (11,31).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%