2011
DOI: 10.1002/nem.800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The semantics of alarm definitions: enabling systematic reasoning about alarms

Abstract: SUMMARY The development and integration of an alarm interface between network elements and a network management system is a costly process, largely because of the informal way in which alarm interfaces are expressed and communicated. Low‐quality alarm documentation and confusion around fundamental concepts like alarm states and alarm types are typical consequences of current practices. If alarm interfaces were expressed in a more formal manner, costs could be reduced and more advanced analysis and automation w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(p. 3) Only a few efforts have been made to characterise the nature of alarm in a broader sense. Notably Stanton (1994), Wallin (2009) and Wallin et al (2012) have contributed with meta-analytic approaches to the problem of alarm conceptualisation.…”
Section: The Conceptual Problem Of Alarm Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(p. 3) Only a few efforts have been made to characterise the nature of alarm in a broader sense. Notably Stanton (1994), Wallin (2009) and Wallin et al (2012) have contributed with meta-analytic approaches to the problem of alarm conceptualisation.…”
Section: The Conceptual Problem Of Alarm Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These definitions are then used to form the alarm definition language, BASS [7]. We will show how BASS can be used to improve the quality of existing informal alarm documentation and how it enables automatic alarm correlation.…”
Section: B Addressing Alarm Semantics With a Domain-specific Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a risk of losing the initial domain experts if the YANG, BASS and SALmon models cannot be communicated in other means than the language itself. We have defined and implemented YANG to UML mapping [13] and also UML and causality graph views for BASS [7].…”
Section: Visualization Of Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation