2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-93692-5_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Semantics Loss Tracker of Firewall Rules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The semantics loss anomaly [2] occurs due to the merger of any two rules, making the original meaning of some rule lose its meaning. According to Figure 7 (Left side), r x and r y were merged into r z , resulting in all meaning of the r x lost immediately.…”
Section: Semantics Loss Anomalymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The semantics loss anomaly [2] occurs due to the merger of any two rules, making the original meaning of some rule lose its meaning. According to Figure 7 (Left side), r x and r y were merged into r z , resulting in all meaning of the r x lost immediately.…”
Section: Semantics Loss Anomalymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a new type of anomaly has been introduced. This new anomaly is semantics loss of rules [2]. In a nutshell, when merging any two rules that overlap, they may lose their original meaning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One typical solution to resolve such conflicts, that is, firewalls choose a rule which matches with the packet being considered first, called the first-match approach. The firewall rules anomalies can be classified into six [1], [2] types representing each anomaly by the theorems:…”
Section: = →mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semantics loss anomaly: The semantics loss represented by [2] occurs when and are merged to by the meaning of both old rules that have been changed or replaced by a new meaning. This anomaly is mostly caused by redundant rules as shown in Figure 1(f).…”
Section: Redundancy Anomalymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation