2018
DOI: 10.1111/lnc3.12270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The semantic map model: State of the art and future avenues for linguistic research

Abstract: The semantic map model is relatively new in linguistic research, but it has been intensively used during the past three decades for studying both cross‐linguistic and language‐specific questions. The goal of the present contribution is to give a comprehensive overview of the model. After introducing the different types of semantic maps, we present the steps involved for building the maps and discuss in more detail the different types of maps and their respective advantages and disadvantages, focusing on the ki… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another procedure consists in having the distinct functions of nominal cases distributed throughout the grammar, depending on the constructions in which they appear. 14 Within the field of linguistic typology, much emphasis has been put on building semantic maps (Cristofaro 2010;Georgakopoulos & Polis 2018;Haspelmath 2003;Malchukov 2010). I will apply this approach in 4.4, where I present and discuss a preliminary semantic map of the uses of the suffix -ʧ Ɂ e ~ -k Ɂ e in Nivaĉle.…”
Section: -ʧ ɂ E ~ -K ɂ E As a Multifunctional Markermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another procedure consists in having the distinct functions of nominal cases distributed throughout the grammar, depending on the constructions in which they appear. 14 Within the field of linguistic typology, much emphasis has been put on building semantic maps (Cristofaro 2010;Georgakopoulos & Polis 2018;Haspelmath 2003;Malchukov 2010). I will apply this approach in 4.4, where I present and discuss a preliminary semantic map of the uses of the suffix -ʧ Ɂ e ~ -k Ɂ e in Nivaĉle.…”
Section: -ʧ ɂ E ~ -K ɂ E As a Multifunctional Markermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model has been developed at the intersection of cognitive linguistics and grammaticalization theory. It draws on the idea of dynamic qualitative semantic maps, envisaged as vectors (Croft 2003;Haspelmath 2003;Narrog, Van der Auwera 2011;Janda 2015), and the concept of the so-called stream -a systemic medium of expansion of maps (Andrason 2016a, b;Georgakopoulos, Polis 2018). 4 The foundation of our model lies in the fact that verbal constructions are inherently polysemous and that this synchronically attested polysemy is coherent.…”
Section: Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the suffixes -hĩ and -ha, the two constructions will henceforth be referred to as the HĨ and the HA gram, respectively. The study is developed within a cognitive and grammaticalization-based framework of dynamic qualitative maps -or vectors (Croft 2003;Haspelmath 2003; Narrog, Van der Auwera 2011; Janda 2015); and their situated extension -the stream (Andrason 2016a, b;Georgakopoulos, Polis 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although delimitation between polysemy and homonymy often is problematic, it is necessary because homonyms do not imply semantic shifts (cf. an opposite attitude towards homonymy in Georgakopoulos & Polis 2018). For example, in Russian there are many homonymic prefixed verbs, which include the same prefix in different meanings, e.g.…”
Section: Identifying Semantic Shifts: Some Problematic Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%