2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0093-934x(02)00524-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The semantic category effect increases with worsening anomia in Alzheimer’s type dementia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
30
1
12

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
30
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the individual case analyses revealed that nine cases of dissociation on the picture naming task were confirmed on the below ceiling naming-to-definition task (only three cases were not confirmed); the confirmation of dissociation on the latter task is harder to reconcile with a ceiling effect in controls. The low incidence of nonliving dissociations accords with the wider category-specific literature (revealing a ratio of approximately 5:1; Laws, 2005) and recent sudies of larger samples of AD patients, which reveal a very low incidence of nonliving deficits: Garrard et al (1998) found just 3 in 58 (5%), while Whatmough et al (2003) found 4 in 72 (5.5%). Our failure to find this elusive 5% may simply reflect the smaller AD sample size used in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Finally, the individual case analyses revealed that nine cases of dissociation on the picture naming task were confirmed on the below ceiling naming-to-definition task (only three cases were not confirmed); the confirmation of dissociation on the latter task is harder to reconcile with a ceiling effect in controls. The low incidence of nonliving dissociations accords with the wider category-specific literature (revealing a ratio of approximately 5:1; Laws, 2005) and recent sudies of larger samples of AD patients, which reveal a very low incidence of nonliving deficits: Garrard et al (1998) found just 3 in 58 (5%), while Whatmough et al (2003) found 4 in 72 (5.5%). Our failure to find this elusive 5% may simply reflect the smaller AD sample size used in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Semantic deficits have been documented in AD using a variety of standard clinical neuropsychological tests (Huff et al, 1986;Rosser and Hodges, 1994;Hodges and Patterson, 1995;Adlam et al, 2006) and using more specific measures (Chertkow and Bub, 1990;Hodges et al, 1992;Greene and Hodges, 1996;Fung et al, 2001;Thompson et al, 2002;Whatmough et al, 2003;Joubert et al, 2010). Working memory deficits are also frequently reported in AD and involve reduced span for words, digits, letters and spatial locations (Grossi et al, 1993;Belleville et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature review revealed that despite the word-finding impairment in the elderly, patients with AD had lower ability to efficiently perform the naming process, compared with healthy individuals (4,6,7,23). Moreover, studies show that lack of proper naming performance could be detected at early stages or unexpectedly during the primary AD stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the studies, there is a growing language-impairment in patients with AD (1). The main compromised language aspects are being verbally fluent (3,4), naming of objects (5,6), discourse processing (7), and semantic comprehension (2,8). According to previous investigations, most impairments are observed at the semantics level of MCI patients (9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%