2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2011.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The self-heating of sulfides: Galvanic effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dissolution of pyrite therefore increases the Fe concentration, resulting in a decreased Cu to Fe ratio as shown in Figure 1b. However, stoichiometric Cu to Fe dissolution of chalcopyrite at 650 mV is expected (Figure 1b), regardless of the presence of pyrite, as this Eh is less than the rest potential of pyrite but greater than that of chalcopyrite [38] and little dissolution of pyrite occurs. These findings are of significance in providing better understanding of the factors affecting dissolution rate of mixed chalcopyrite and pyrite systems in AMD systems within the most often observed Eh range of 500-800 mV (SHE) [39][40][41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The dissolution of pyrite therefore increases the Fe concentration, resulting in a decreased Cu to Fe ratio as shown in Figure 1b. However, stoichiometric Cu to Fe dissolution of chalcopyrite at 650 mV is expected (Figure 1b), regardless of the presence of pyrite, as this Eh is less than the rest potential of pyrite but greater than that of chalcopyrite [38] and little dissolution of pyrite occurs. These findings are of significance in providing better understanding of the factors affecting dissolution rate of mixed chalcopyrite and pyrite systems in AMD systems within the most often observed Eh range of 500-800 mV (SHE) [39][40][41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As the rest potential of galena (0.40 V SHE) is less than that of either pyrite (0.66 V SHE) or sphalerite (0.46 V SHE) (Majima, 1969), galena when in galvanic contact with these minerals will tend to oxidise preferentially (Peng et al, 2003;Chandra and Gerson, 2009;Payant et al, 2012;Rao and Finch, 1988;Kwong et al, 2003). Oxidation of the anodic mineral is frequently accompanied by the dissolution and re-adsorption of its metal ion(s) onto the original mineral and the surface of other minerals (Cullinan et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exothermic oxidation of iron sulphides is an associated common cause for self-heating and has been observed in iron sulphide bearing coal and numerous mines and milling operations (Li and Parr 1926;Rosenblum and Spira 1995;Ninteman 1978;Payant et al 2012). Mariner et al (2008) reported selfignition of pyrite in organic shales caused by a landslide, leading to air penetration to pyrite nodules.…”
Section: Mechanisms For Self-combustionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heat can spontaneously be generated by a few natural exothermic reactions including exothermic oxidation of fine-grained iron sulphide minerals (Rosenblum and Spira 1995;Payant et al 2012), which is the most assumed cause of ignition and it is a common phenomenon in coal combustion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%