The Selective Value of Bacterial Shape

Abstract

SUMMARY Why do bacteria have shape? Is morphology valuable or just a trivial secondary characteristic? Why should bacteria have one shape instead of another? Three broad considerations suggest that bacterial shapes are not accidental but are biologically important: cells adopt uniform morphologies from among a wide variety of possibilities, some cells modify their shape as conditions demand, and morphology can be tracked through evolutionary lineages. All of these imply that shape is a selectable feature that aids survival. The aim of this review is to spell out the physical, environmental, and biological forces that favor different bacterial morphologies and which, therefore, contribute to natural selection. Specifically, cell shape is driven by eight general considerations: nutrient access, cell division and segregation, attachment to surfaces, passive dispersal, active motility, polar differentiation, the need to escape predators, and the advantages of cellular differentiation. Bacteria respond to these forces by performing a type of calculus, integrating over a number of environmental and behavioral factors to produce a size and shape that are optimal for the circumstances in which they live. Just as we are beginning to answer how bacteria create their shapes, it seems reasonable and essential that we expand our efforts to understand why they do so.

Subglacial Lake Whillans microbial biogeochemistry: a synthesis of current knowledge

“…While the morphology of microbial cells does not confer information on taxonomy, it can provide insight on the ecological niche of the microorganism. For example, morphology can influence nutrient acquisition, motility, surface attachment, cell division and passive dispersal [69,70]. These selective traits can impact the evolutionary path of an organism ( [70] and references therein).…”

Modelling bacterial behaviour close to a no-slip plane boundary: the influence of bacterial geometry

“…While this may have some relevance, particularly in the design of artificial microswimmers, there are a host of other factors that would affect biological fitness of bacteria in nature (Young 2006). Even if the only aim was to make the fastest possible swimmer, there would be several conditions to consider, such as the flagellar motor capabilities, as well as the cell and flagellum shapes.…”

A Novel Algorithm for the Determination of Bacterial Cell Volumes That is Unbiased by Cell Morphology

“…The same may hold true for prokaryotic microbes, which may also substantially differ in cell size~Bertoni et al, 2010! and, to a lesser extent, in shapẽ Young, 2006!. This information may be ecologically highly relevant, e.g., with respect to their growth potential and predation vulnerability~Chrzanowski & Simek, 1990; In fact, strikingly different conclusions may be reached about the relative importance of particular populations within microbial assemblages if analyzed in terms of biomass rather than abundances~Pernthaler et al., 2004;Posch et al, 2009!. In addition to the determination of biovolumes of entire communities, it has also become more important to accurately measure the volume of individual microbes to study their ecophysiology.…”