The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC)

Pamučar, Dragan; Ćirović, Goran

doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.057

Cited by 731 publications

(390 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

301

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…One reason is the different criteria normalization. In [32], it was shown that methods using a linear model of input data normalization have greater stability and rank consistently during sensitivity analysis. The MAIRCA method uses a linear normalization model.…”

Section: Definition Of Aim/problem and Model Architecturementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The MAIRCA method uses a linear normalization model. The second reason for choosing the MAIRCA Sustainability 2016, 8,372 4 of 30 method is its simple mathematic apparatus, solution stability and the possibility to combine this method with other ones [32].…”

Section: Definition Of Aim/problem and Model Architecturementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Sensitivity analysis is completed by changing the initial criteria weights [32], as it is shown in Table 18. According to the recommendations [32], the sensitivity analysis of the location rankings has been conducted through five scenarios. The first scenario (A) deals with the equalized criteria weights w i = 1/5 = 0.2000.…”

Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The original DEMATEL method is modified by some researchers so as to make it comply with their problems. The modified DEMATEL method which is used in this paper is adapted from the study of [48] (Figure 2). While solving real problems, criteria do not have the same degree of significance so the DM has to define significance factors for some criteria using weighting coefficients (weights) or criteria evaluation.…”

Section: Comparison and Relative Assessment Of Criteria Weight (Dematmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The original DEMATEL method is modified by some researchers so as to make it comply with their problems. The modified DEMATEL method which is used in this paper is adapted from the study of [48] (Figure 2). The full procedure of the previously defined DEMATEL method is explained as follows:…”

Section: Comparison and Relative Assessment Of Criteria Weight (Dematmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

The Combination of Expert Judgment and GIS-MAIRCA Analysis for the Selection of Sites for Ammunition Depots

et al. 2016

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper suggests spatial multi-criteria model in order to assist decision makers in the selection of sites which are suitable for ammunition depots (AD). They represent military facilities which have more criteria that need to be matched than civil structures. The proposed model is based on combined use of Geographic information systems (GIS) and multi-criteria techniques. The model application is presented in the case study of Carpathian region, the Eastern part of Serbia. The model deals with nine restrictions and six evaluation criteria. Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory-Analytic Network Process (DEMATEL-ANP) multi-criteria techniques are used to determine weight coefficients of evaluation criteria. Along with the above mentioned methods, this paper introduces a new technique for the multi-criteria decision making-MAIRCA (MultiAttributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis) method. The MAIRCA method is used for the ranking and selection of suitable locations. The results have shown that 45 km 2 of the Carpathian region is very suitable for ammunition depot construction. The MAIRCA method chose location L1 as the most appropriate. Sensitivity analysis shows that the model is capable of identifying a suitable ammunition depot location. This approach can be helpful in determining suitable ammunition depot locations in other regions with similar geographic conditions and can also be successfully used for the suitability assessment of existing ammunition depots.

show abstract

Section: Definition Of Aim/problem and Model Architecturementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Definition Of Aim/problem and Model Architecturementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Comparison and Relative Assessment Of Criteria Weight (Dematmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The original DEMATEL method is modified by some researchers so as to make it comply with their problems. The modified DEMATEL method which is used in this paper is adapted from the study of [48] (Figure 2). The full procedure of the previously defined DEMATEL method is explained as follows:…”

Section: Comparison and Relative Assessment Of Criteria Weight (Dematmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The Combination of Expert Judgment and GIS-MAIRCA Analysis for the Selection of Sites for Ammunition Depots

et al. 2016

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Pythagorean Fuzzy Choquet Integral Based MABAC Method for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making

Peng

Yang

2016

Int. J. Intell. Syst.

289

155

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we define the Choquet integral operator for Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators, such as Pythagorean fuzzy Choquet integral average (PFCIA) operator and Pythagorean fuzzy Choquet integral geometric (PFCIG) operator. The operators not only consider the importance of the elements or their ordered positions but also can reflect the correlations among the elements or their ordered positions. It is worth pointing out that most of the existing Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators are special cases of our operators. Meanwhile, some basic properties are discussed in detail. Later, we propose two approaches to multiple attribute group decision making with attributes involving dependent and independent by the PFCIA operator and multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC) in Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Finally, two illustrative examples have also been taken in the present study to verify the developed approaches and to demonstrate their practicality and effectiveness. C 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

show abstract

A normal wiggly hesitant fuzzy linguistic projection‐based multiattributive border approximation area comparison method

Лю

Pedrycz

2020

Int J Intell Syst

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC)

Cited by 731 publications

References 36 publications

The Combination of Expert Judgment and GIS-MAIRCA Analysis for the Selection of Sites for Ammunition Depots

The Combination of Expert Judgment and GIS-MAIRCA Analysis for the Selection of Sites for Ammunition Depots

Pythagorean Fuzzy Choquet Integral Based MABAC Method for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making

A normal wiggly hesitant fuzzy linguistic projection‐based multiattributive border approximation area comparison method

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About