2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The selection of renewable energy technologies using a hybrid subjective and objective multiple criteria decision making method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the subjective weighting methods, the criteria weights and the alternatives’ scores mainly depend on the decision makers’ judgements and preferences via pairwise comparisons, the potential uncertainty of which is considered the prime disadvantage of the subjective methods (Sahoo et al 2016 ; Sitorus and Brito-Parada 2022 ). As a subjective weighting method, the ordered binary comparison method combines qualitative ranking and quantitative scaling, aiming to distinguish the importance of factors by repeatedly comparing every two factors to identify the ranks and weights of factors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the subjective weighting methods, the criteria weights and the alternatives’ scores mainly depend on the decision makers’ judgements and preferences via pairwise comparisons, the potential uncertainty of which is considered the prime disadvantage of the subjective methods (Sahoo et al 2016 ; Sitorus and Brito-Parada 2022 ). As a subjective weighting method, the ordered binary comparison method combines qualitative ranking and quantitative scaling, aiming to distinguish the importance of factors by repeatedly comparing every two factors to identify the ranks and weights of factors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Çolak and Kaya [46] proposed an integrated MCDM model, which combines the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) and fuzzy TOPSIS method to prioritize the renewable energy alternatives in Turkey. Sitorus and Brito-Parada [47] used the hybrid MCDM method to select renewable energy technologies by considering both subjective and objective multiple criteria. Ullah et al [48] used an integrated model by combining fuzzy AHP, fuzzy TOPSIS, fuzzy EDAS, and fuzzy MOORA to plan the on/off grid hybrid renewable energy supply.…”
Section: Renewable Energy Technology Selection and Mcdmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimating the objective weights of disaster preparedness criteria is beneficial as it can overcome the problem of an exclusive focus on the subjective disaster preparedness criteria. However, in line with Sitorus and Parada (2022), a hybrid subjective and objective disaster preparedness dimension weightage approach is a more effective approach because it allows for gauging both the decision-makers’ preferences and the objective information contained in the disaster dimensional preparedness data. The composite of weight criteria Uji, which presents the combination of subjective weight YjS and objective weight VjO can be obtained from the following mathematical expression:…”
Section: Integrating Statistical Variance and Piv – The Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%