The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.21000/jasmr18020001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Selection and Operation of Earth Moving Equipment for the Rehabilitation of Functional Soil Profiles: An updating of the UK guidance

Abstract: Soil conservation and replacement can be key factors in the sustainable use of land following mineral extraction. The earth-moving equipment and the methodology used can determine the character and functioning of the rehabilitated soil ecosystem. Practical guidance for the handling of soils by different earthmoving machines was published by the UK's Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in 2000. It was in a form which could be understood and used by professionals and machine operators alike and has been … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is contrary to the view that trees and shrubs of similar woodlands could not be moved and had to be replaced as planted nursery-grown stock (Helliwell et al, 1986;Craig et al, 2015;Buckley et al, 2017), although as Anderson (2003) commented about the Stansted Airport scheme, this is governed by the size and type of machines available. Subject to the safe use of machines to recover the soils and vegetation (Humphries et al, 2018), the translocation at Mountsorrel Quarry demonstrates that it is physically feasible to move a woodland flora with its shallow top-soils and component tree and shrub flora (provided they are coppiced) without undue operational difficulty. A similar view for the transplanting of the tree canopy component has been expressed by Down and Morton (1998) and Anderson (2003).…”
Section: Implications For Future Woodland Translocationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is contrary to the view that trees and shrubs of similar woodlands could not be moved and had to be replaced as planted nursery-grown stock (Helliwell et al, 1986;Craig et al, 2015;Buckley et al, 2017), although as Anderson (2003) commented about the Stansted Airport scheme, this is governed by the size and type of machines available. Subject to the safe use of machines to recover the soils and vegetation (Humphries et al, 2018), the translocation at Mountsorrel Quarry demonstrates that it is physically feasible to move a woodland flora with its shallow top-soils and component tree and shrub flora (provided they are coppiced) without undue operational difficulty. A similar view for the transplanting of the tree canopy component has been expressed by Down and Morton (1998) and Anderson (2003).…”
Section: Implications For Future Woodland Translocationsmentioning
confidence: 99%