1982
DOI: 10.1016/0030-5073(82)90243-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The selection and consequences of job comparisons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known, for example, that employees often compare the characteristics of their own jobs with those of others in their work units-and that they have negative reactions when they perceive their jobs to be relatively lower in quality (Oldham, Nottenburg, Kassner, Ferris, Fedor, & Masters, 1982). Thus, if some employees engage in job crafting and introduce conspicuous positive changes, will people who elected not to craft their job exhibit lower satisfaction and productivity thereafter?…”
Section: Job Craftingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known, for example, that employees often compare the characteristics of their own jobs with those of others in their work units-and that they have negative reactions when they perceive their jobs to be relatively lower in quality (Oldham, Nottenburg, Kassner, Ferris, Fedor, & Masters, 1982). Thus, if some employees engage in job crafting and introduce conspicuous positive changes, will people who elected not to craft their job exhibit lower satisfaction and productivity thereafter?…”
Section: Job Craftingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Economists seek the causes of segregation in individual preferences and the characteristics of workers and employers (Brown and Corcoran, 1997;Kanter, 1977;Pearson and Sachs, 1980;Phelps, 1972;Walsh, 1977). Sociologists differ from economists in that they view segregation as a causal mechanism that gives rise to other differences between men and women (Marshall, 1992;Oldham et al, 1982;Suls and Miller, 1977;Tomaskovic-Devey, 1993). Psychologists emphasize the differences between men and women in their values and views when analyzing their expectations regarding earnings, and thus, their subsequent occupational segregation (Lips, 1991;Major and Konar, 1984;Thomas and Velthouse, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In organizational settings, distributive justice research concentrated primarily on perceptions of equity [12]. This research demonstrated that individuals consider distributive justice for a variety of organizational outcomes including pay [17], job challenge [18 ], job security [19], supervision [19], office space [20], and layoffs [21]. Additionally, organizational research on distributive fairness showed that individuals' perceptions of the fairness of outcomes affect their attitudes and behaviors (e.g., job satisfaction, organizational commitment, performance, intention to remain with the organization, organizational citizenship behavior).…”
Section: Organizational Justicementioning
confidence: 99%