2013
DOI: 10.1029/2012jb009479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The seismic cycle at subduction thrusts: 2. Dynamic implications of geodynamic simulations validated with laboratory models

Abstract: [1] The physics governing the seismic cycle at seismically active subduction zones remains poorly understood due to restricted direct observations in time and space. To investigate subduction zone dynamics and associated interplate seismicity, we validate a continuum, visco-elasto-plastic numerical model with a new laboratory approach (Paper 1). The analogous laboratory setup includes a visco-elastic gelatin wedge underthrusted by a rigid plate with defined velocity-weakening and -strengthening regions. Our ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
101
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
(198 reference statements)
3
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14). This is consistent with numerical simulations (Das and Scholz, 1983;van Dinther et al, 2013a, b, Pipping et al, 2016. In nature, the spatial relation between the hypocentre and the rupture area is less clear: the hypocentres of the 2004 M9.2 Sumatra and 2010 M8.8 Chile earthquakes were located in the deepest part of the rupture (Rhie et al, 2007;Moreno et al, 2010), probably aided by the lithostatic pressure and locking gradient.…”
Section: Rupture Dynamicssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…14). This is consistent with numerical simulations (Das and Scholz, 1983;van Dinther et al, 2013a, b, Pipping et al, 2016. In nature, the spatial relation between the hypocentre and the rupture area is less clear: the hypocentres of the 2004 M9.2 Sumatra and 2010 M8.8 Chile earthquakes were located in the deepest part of the rupture (Rhie et al, 2007;Moreno et al, 2010), probably aided by the lithostatic pressure and locking gradient.…”
Section: Rupture Dynamicssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…recurrence time, coseismic displacement, rupture duration, rupture velocity, slip rate, rupture width, and hypocentre location). A robust fit has been obtained for the majority of the investigated parameters of the reference model (van Dinther et al, 2013a). In particular, the mean of individual source parameters of the numerical model falls systematically within the standard deviation of the same parameter of the analogue models.…”
Section: Seismotectonic Scale Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations