The Seeking Mental Health Care model: prediction of help-seeking for depressive symptoms by stigma and mental illness representations

Abstract

Background Only about half the people with depression seek professional health care services. To constitute the different predictors and associating variables of health care utilisation, we model the process and aim to test our hypothesised Seeking Mental Health Care Model. The model includes empirical influences on the help-seeking process to predict actual behaviour and incorporates superordinate (stigma, treatment experiences) as well as intermediate attitudinal variables (continuum and causal beliefs, depression literacy and self-efficacy). Method All variables are examined in an online study (baseline, three- and six-month follow-up). The sample consisted of adults with depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 sum score ≥ 8), currently not receiving mental health care treatment. To examine the prediction of variables explaining help-seeking behaviour, a path model analysis was carried out (lavaan package, software R). Results Altogether, 1368 participants (Mage = 42.38, SDage = 15.22, 65.6% female) were included, 983 participating in at least one follow-up. Model fit was excellent (i.e., RMSEA = 0.059, CFI = 0.989), and the model confirmed most of the hypothesised predictions. Intermediary variables were significantly associated with stigma and experiences. Depression literacy (ß = .28), continuum beliefs (ß = .11) and openness to a balanced biopsychosocial causal model (ß = .21) significantly influenced self-identification (R2 = .35), which among the causal beliefs and self-efficacy influenced help-seeking intention (R2 = .10). Intention (ß = .40) prospectively predicted help-seeking behaviour (R2 = .16). Conclusion The Seeking Mental Health Care Model provides an empirically validated conceptualisation of the help-seeking process of people with untreated depressive symptoms as a comprehensive approach considering internal influences. Implications and open questions are discussed, e.g., regarding differentiated assessment of self-efficacy, usefulness of continuum beliefs and causal beliefs in anti-stigma work, and replication of the model for other mental illnesses. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00023557. Registered 11 December 2020. World Health Organization, Universal Trial Number: U1111–1264-9954. Registered 16 February 2021.

Assessing prognosis in depression: comparing perspectives of AI models, mental health professionals and the general public

“…When individuals with depression receive professional help, there is a shared sense of optimism among all groups (LLMs, mental health professionals and the general public), indicating the significance of receiving professional help when coping with depression. 43 Professional help is known to be effective for preventing and managing mental health issues, improving understanding, coping skills, and interpersonal support, and thereby reducing suicidal thoughts. 44 …”

Intentions and barriers to help-seeking in children and adolescents differing in depression severity: Cross-sectional results from a school-based mental health project

“…Further research should also consider other potential mediators and moderators. First studies have already targeted this with respect to students or adults [6,40], but still other potentially in uencing factors like suicidality has not been addressed yet in a younger sample.…”

Addressing the Increasing Mental Health Distress and Mental Illness Among Young Adults in the United States

“…Antistigma campaigns, such as the National Alliance on Mental Illness' “stigma free ” campaign (Clement et al, 2015; McLaren et al, 2023) and the Mental Health First Aid program (Kitchener and Jorm, 2008), were designed to increase knowledge about mental illness, decrease stigma, and increase treatment seeking. One consequence may be increasing endorsement of mental illness symptoms among young people.…”