2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12134-018-0637-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Securitization of the Syrian Refugee Crisis Through Political Party Discourses

Abstract: The present study investigates major Turkish political party discourses about the Syrian refugees in Turkey based on parties' manifestoes and pamphlets. The refugee problem increased nationalist feelings in Turkey specifically when the president of Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, explained that the Syrians could be naturalized. To analyse this situation, we draw on theories on securitization and xenophobia. Political party discourses were analysed by Nvivo 11 software program. The results suggest that while the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on this teaching of Islam, the current government used the Ansar and Muhajir approach to make the complex process more manageable. The literature on the perception of threat towards Syrians in Turkey supports the empirical findings obtained in this study (Erdogan 2020;Gulmez 2019;Koçak 2021;Kocak et al 2021;Şahin 2016). The fact that religiosity reduces the perception of threat towards refugees in Turkey is a unique model because refugees are seen as a threat in terms of economic, political, and security reasons in the world.…”
Section: Direct Effectssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on this teaching of Islam, the current government used the Ansar and Muhajir approach to make the complex process more manageable. The literature on the perception of threat towards Syrians in Turkey supports the empirical findings obtained in this study (Erdogan 2020;Gulmez 2019;Koçak 2021;Kocak et al 2021;Şahin 2016). The fact that religiosity reduces the perception of threat towards refugees in Turkey is a unique model because refugees are seen as a threat in terms of economic, political, and security reasons in the world.…”
Section: Direct Effectssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Additionally, the current government, a center-right and conservative-democratic party, has consistently maintained a humanitarian and brotherhood-based attitude towards Syrian refugees, viewing them as guests rather than refugees (Lazarev and Sharma 2017). This approach reflects Ansar and Muhajir Islamic discourse from the time of the Prophet Muhammed (Gulmez 2019). Therefore, the current ruling party used Ansar and Muhajir discourse, and in the party manifesto, Syrian refugees were accepted as guests, and the right of temporary protection was given.…”
Section: Hypothesis 3 (H3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case load of Syrians in Turkey — 3.6 million at the time of writing — has overwhelmed the new DGMM’s capacity, and even with the assistance of international organizations and local NGOs, Syrian refugees’ service needs have not been met (Program Officer, UNHCR; Istanbul, Turkey, May 12, 2015). The Syrian population’s size has also been used by political opposition groups during elections to fuel xenophobic sentiments among Turkish voters (Gulmez 2018), leading to increasingly hostile and exclusionary public rhetoric toward Syrians and instances of anti-refugee violence (International Crisis Group 2018). Additionally, the ruling Justice and Development Party’s ( Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi or AKP) negotiation of an up-to-6 billion Euro aid package, coupled with the reinvigoration of EU accession negotiations and visa liberalization for Turkish citizens, has had a perverse effect on the nascent DGMM and broader asylum system in Turkey (Heck and Hess 2017), with civil-society actors fearing the return to a more securitized approach to migration generally.…”
Section: Implications For Migrants and Refugeesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much evidence shows that this option is more like a symbol of solidarity than willingness to accept large number of refugees. Usually, the international community prefers to provide money to support the refugees in the country of asylum than taking the refugees crisis to their backyard [8]. This makes the only available options for the refugee crisis either local integration or "warehousing" refugees in camps for an unknown period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%