The securitization of climate change and the power of conceptions of security

Abstract

This paper looks at recent studies that have addressed climate change as a security issue. Posing climate change as a pro blem for security has provided it with a major boost in attention. However, it raises the potential of 'securitization', i.e. that the issue is primarily addressed via traditional means of security policy. The paper analyses how selected studies frame the issue of climate change and security and considers what recommendations they make on dealing with the problem. Among its findings are that the framing of climate change as a security issue is not based on well founded analysis but is rather largely driven by ad hoc theo ries on the links between environmental degradation and violent conflict. A second finding is that different conceptualisations of security lead to different types of recommendation on how to deal with the consequences of climate change as they relate to peace and security. Securitizing the issue therefore does not necessarily lead the authors of studies to prescribe predominantly traditional security instruments for dealing with crises. However, although the authors reach different conclusions, their diagnosis of climate change as a security issue is likely to push the climate change discourse towards the use of traditional security instruments. A third finding of the paper is therefore that the mixing of different conceptions of security may increase the 'attention grabbing' power of studies but also muddle their messages.

The Democratic Securitization of Climate Change in India

“…Exploring development issues in Africa, it is argued that securitization of development also encourages and supports militarization and “illiberal state‐builders” (Fisher & Anderson, , p. 136). Securitization of an issue reinforces the state‐centric discourse and confrontational politics that prevent potential negotiations on climate change issues (Brzoska, ). Patrick Hodder and Brian Martin (, pp.…”

Intergovernmental organizations and climate security: advancing the research agenda

“…By contrast, critical approaches usually problematize the effects of discourse on climate security, especially for marginalized groups such as irregular migrants . Empirical evidence comes mostly from the EU and the UNSC, with fewer contributions focusing on other IGOs with a mandate in defense such as NATO, the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), and the Arctic Council …”

Visualizing Climate-Refugees: Race, Vulnerability, and Resilience in Global Liberal Politics

“…By and large, the literature on climate security agrees that global warming is increasingly understood as a security issue-not, however, security in the sense of national security (Brzoska 2009;Detraz and Betsill 2009;Methmann and Rothe 2012;Oels 2012;McDonald 2013). Given this, I employ a notion of security that emerges from Foucault's lectures on biopolitics, governmentality, and security (Foucault 2007(Foucault , 2008.…”

“…The possibility of climate-induced migration makes climate change a "threat multiplier" (UN Secretary General 2009). Scholars have engaged with this securitization of climate change and climate-induced migration from various perspectives (Trombetta 2008;Brzoska 2009;Hartmann 2010;Methmann and Rothe 2012;Oels 2012;McDonald 2013). However, this literature only covers the language and practices of securitization.…”