The securitization of citizenship in a ‘Segregated City’: a reflection on Rio’s Pacifying Police Units

Abstract

The Pacification Police Units -UPPs -implemented in Rio de Janeiro since 2008 have as one of their stated goals the promotion of the integration between the pacified favelas and the 'formal' city, aiming to overcome the view of Rio as a 'divided city'. Intending to problematize the reasoning behind this stated goal in order to question the UPPs' very foundations, this article examines the political and sociospatial background in which they were introduced. The implementation and operation of the UPPs is outlined in the context of the militarization of Rio's spaces, and especially of its urban poor regions, within an analysis of what assumptions about favelas and slum residents the UPPs imply. The UPPs are analyzed in dialogue with Giorgio Agamben's work as a sovereign act of 'drawing lines of distinction' between lives worth living and politically worthless 'Others'. It becomes clear that they are guilty of articulating and reinforcing what Teresa Caldeira has named the 'talk of crime', a Manicheistic discourse through which Brazilians articulate and cope with their daily encounter with violence. The disjunctive nature of Brazil's 'inclusively inegalitarian' democracy, as explored by James Holston, is emphasized. Brazil emerges as a post-dictatorial country, in which neoliberal reforms and democratic opening have simultaneously implied an increasingly authoritarian penal state that targets the urban marginalized as its 'internal enemies'. Keywords: UPPs. Public security policy. Brazilian democracy. Urban segregation. Resumo As Unidades de Polícia Pacificadora -UPPs -implementadas no Rio de

Framing urban threats: A socio-spatial analysis of urban securitisation in Latin America and the Caribbean

“…In LAC, urban segregation itself has become securitised, seen as a problem that justifies the use of exceptional measures. In Rio de Janeiro and Medellin, for example, the historical disconnection of marginalised favelas and comunas from the 'formal' city was problematised as a source of violence and a danger to the urban order (Abello Colak, 2013;Poets, 2015), leading to strategies of pacification, reinforcing the divide between the informal and formal city. The securitisation of segregation has also resulted in differential treatment from police and state officials based on urban citizens' identity and place of residence.…”

Sharing Authority: The Politics and Practice of Community Policing in the Brazilian Slum

“…Scholarly criticism of Brazil's CP programs over the years has largely focused on its failure to adhere to core principles of the CP model as it was embraced in the Global North, namely its concern with decentralized administration and citizen consultation for the prioritization of communities' security needs (Arias and Ungar ; Fruhling ). Others have gone further, suggesting that what is practiced in Brazil is not really CP at all, rather a form of military occupation that serves merely to perpetuate a worldview in which slum dwellers are perceived by middle‐ and upper‐class society as barbaric and dangerous (Poets ).…”