The secretory effect of sympathetic stimulation on the cat's submaxillary gland was augmented greatly when studied against a background of slow secretion evoked by parasympathetic stimulation at a low frequency and imitating the slow resting secretion normally present in the waking state. The sympathetic secretory threshold was markedly lowered, and even at low frequencies sympathetic stimulation caused a large, wellmaintained response. After an x-adrenoceptor blocking drug sympathetic stimulation alone lost its secretory effect, but during resting secretion part of the accelerating effect was found to remain; this effect was elicited via P-adrenoceptors. A marked secretory effect of sympathetic stimulation was also obtained during resting secretion in the parotid gland, where the sympathetic secretory effect is normally very small.The salivary responses to electrical stimulation of the cervical sympathetic trunk are usually not very impressive, although salivary glands are generally assumed to receive not only parasympathetic but also sympathetic secretory nerves. After a fairly long latency flow starts, but this, in most glands, is slow and often tends to decline and even cease despite continued stimulation. This applies, for instance, to the submaxillary gland of the dog, and in the parotid of this species no secretion at all, or very little, results from sympathetic excitation. However, in recent experiments on these two glands quite a different picture was obtained when attempts were made to study the sympathetic effect under conditions thought to be more physiological than in previous studies [Emmelin and Gj6rstrup, 1975]. The slow resting secretion normally present in the waking state and induced by way of the parasympathetic nerves [see Babkin, 1950] was reproduced by stimulating these nerves at a low frequency, and the effect of sympathetic stimulation was observed against such a secretory background activity. Further, by injecting an a(-adrenoceptor blocking drug the vasoconstriction was prevented. This vasoconstriction is normally obtained on electrical excitation ofthe sympathetic trunk and might interfere with secretion; it does not belong to the response when the sympathetic secretory mechanism is activated in the course of physiological events [see Emmelin and Engstr6m, 1960]. When the a-adrenoceptor was blocked sympathetic stimulation had a marked, ,B-adrenoceptor mediated, secretory effect both in the submaxillary and the parotid gland of the dog.In the present investigation the secretory effect of sympathetic stimulation was studied in the cat's submaxillary gland during resting secretion. No oc-blocking drug was given initially, since in this gland sympathetic secretion is elicited via oc-adrenoceptors [see Emmelin, Schneyer and Schneyer, 1973] and not as in the dog via /-adrenoceptors [Emmelin and Holmberg, 1967]. Abolition of vasoconstriction was considered less important as the sympathetic 325 VOL. LX, No. 4 -1975 2