Encyclopedia of Analytical Surfaces 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11773-7_35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Second Order Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are also clearly interpretable, e.g., the main axis yields the tilt of the streamer. For 3-D objects, we considered using subsets of quadrics (second order surfaces, see Krivoshapko and Ivanov, 2015) but recognized that the extension of 2-D fitting to 3-D data is a highly nontrivial task. To explore the geometrical structure, but also to exploratorily analyze the presented algorithm and the data set itself, interactive 3-D visualizations proved to be an essential tool for comprehensive depictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are also clearly interpretable, e.g., the main axis yields the tilt of the streamer. For 3-D objects, we considered using subsets of quadrics (second order surfaces, see Krivoshapko and Ivanov, 2015) but recognized that the extension of 2-D fitting to 3-D data is a highly nontrivial task. To explore the geometrical structure, but also to exploratorily analyze the presented algorithm and the data set itself, interactive 3-D visualizations proved to be an essential tool for comprehensive depictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are also clearly interpretable; e.g., the main axis yields the tilt of the streamer. For 3-D objects, we considered using subsets of quadrics (second-order surfaces; see Krivoshapko and Ivanov, 2015) but recognized that the extension of 2-D fitting to 3-D data is a highly non-trivial task. To explore the geometrical structure, but also to exploratorily analyze the pre-sented algorithm and the data set itself, interactive 3-D visualizations proved to be an essential tool for comprehensive depictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because both Equations 3 and 4 are second-order equations, they define second-order surfaces. 52,53 If we disregard the degenerate cases of these surfaces, then Equation 3 will describe only one surface, that is, a hyperbolic paraboloid all sections of which with horizontal planes are hyperbolas with perpendicular asymptotes (Figure 2A). A more general model (4) defines 2 possible response surfaces-a general hyperbolic paraboloid with a random arrangement of the asymptotes created by its horizontal sections, or an elliptic paraboloid 52,53 ( Figure 2B).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%