2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.fitote.2011.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The screening toolbox of bioactive substances from natural products: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 152 publications
0
29
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we present a brief overview of assays used to determine bioactivities of phytochemicals on the protein-, cell-, or organism level. For further information on the topic, we refer the reader to the following excellent reviews: (Agarwal et al, 2014;Butterweck and Nahrstedt, 2012;Fallarero et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2011a). Methods for activity assaying that are based on simple chemical reactions, such as some widely used methods to determine in vitro antioxidant properties (e.g., the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging assay), have been reviewed elsewhere (Gulcin, 2012;Moon and Shibamoto, 2009) and will not be discussed in detail here.…”
Section: Considerations Regarding the Choice Of Bioassaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we present a brief overview of assays used to determine bioactivities of phytochemicals on the protein-, cell-, or organism level. For further information on the topic, we refer the reader to the following excellent reviews: (Agarwal et al, 2014;Butterweck and Nahrstedt, 2012;Fallarero et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2011a). Methods for activity assaying that are based on simple chemical reactions, such as some widely used methods to determine in vitro antioxidant properties (e.g., the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging assay), have been reviewed elsewhere (Gulcin, 2012;Moon and Shibamoto, 2009) and will not be discussed in detail here.…”
Section: Considerations Regarding the Choice Of Bioassaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of bioactive compounds or mixtures on specific cells is usually conducted through bioassays and molecular tests (Barros et al, 2007;Meca et al, 2010;Muller-Riebau et al, 1995;Skotti et al, 2014;Zambonelli et al, 1996). Plant extracts, either aqueous or in organic solvents, have shown antimicrobial activity when examined by different screening models (Wang et al, 2011) mainly towards finding successful drug candidates. Biological activity of plant extracts is being investigated through alterations in photosynthetic mechanism or stress status of plants (Bouchagier et al, 2008;Bouchagier and Efthimiadis, 2010), bioassays (Abou-Jawdah et al, 2004;Daferera et al, 2003), tissue or cell culture (Wang et al, 2011), receptor enzyme (Peelman et al, 2006) and biochromatography (He et al, 2008;Kotecha et al, 2007;Kvalheim et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these biomacromolecules are important drug targets and the drug must act at the target site within the cell membrane. The chromatographic stationary phase that contains live cell membranes can mimic the physiological process and selectively bind active compounds in sample, making CMC a suitable technique for the identification of active components in complex sample matrices, such as NPs [16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%