2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2012.05783.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Italian Euromelanoma Day: evaluation of results and implications for future prevention campaigns

Abstract: The 2010 Italian Euromelanoma Day produced good results in terms of melanoma detection/suspicion rates, likely due to the extensive use of full clinical and dermoscopic examinations. The campaign failed to attract many high-risk individuals. Targeted communication strategies are needed to this regard.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

6
36
2
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
6
36
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in the population screened during the Italian Euromelanoma day 2010, 6.1% had phototype I, 18.6% II whilst a higher prevalence of dark phototypes (44.9% III and 30.4% phototype IV) was reported with respect to our population; moreover, a sunburn was reported to have taken place before 18 years of age in 35.2% [12]. In the previous similar events from 2005 to 2007, different figures were reported, more similar to those found in our study, with only 7.9% phototype IV and 39.9% phototype II [13]. There are also some studies which reported phenotype and/or phototype distribution in specific regions of Italy in patients without melanoma, who could constitute a valid comparison.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…For instance, in the population screened during the Italian Euromelanoma day 2010, 6.1% had phototype I, 18.6% II whilst a higher prevalence of dark phototypes (44.9% III and 30.4% phototype IV) was reported with respect to our population; moreover, a sunburn was reported to have taken place before 18 years of age in 35.2% [12]. In the previous similar events from 2005 to 2007, different figures were reported, more similar to those found in our study, with only 7.9% phototype IV and 39.9% phototype II [13]. There are also some studies which reported phenotype and/or phototype distribution in specific regions of Italy in patients without melanoma, who could constitute a valid comparison.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…Previously, the Euromelanoma task force in conjunction with the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) organized a Skin Cancer Screening Day at the European Parliament in Brussels (Belgium) for three consecutive years (2011-2013), whose results are currently under evaluation. 21 The differences in terms of melanoma detection rates (1.6 here, vs. 0.28%) and PPVs (100 here, vs. 21.4%) in the two studies are due to the fact that only one melanoma was suspected and confirmed in the present screening, compared to 15 (three confirmed) in the general one. 30 The Skin Cancer Screening Day at the Italian parliament produced slightly different results than those obtained from the Italian Euromelanoma screening of the general population, 21 in particular in terms of overall suspicion rate of skin cancer (14.5% in this study, 4.6% in the general population screening).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…As previously found, dermatoscopy can increase the odds of diagnosing a melanoma by at least nine times as compared with a naked eye examination. 21,32 The strengths of this study are that this is the first report of a skin cancer campaign within a national parliament and that an internationally validated questionnaire was used. 30 Conversely, we have found no evidence that Italian MPs are more aware of skin cancers, risk factors for their occurrence, and methods of sun protection compared to the general public, either adults 21 or adolescents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20][21][22][23][24] A média de idade foi 48 anos, sendo que 68% tinham 55 ou menos anos. A média de idades nos diferentes estudos é relativamente baixa, variando entre 33 e 60 anos.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…A utilização de protetor solar, embora possa ser melhorada, é relativamente boa (66% usam o protetor sempre que estão a apanhar banhos de sol, comparando com 32% a 35% em estudos italianos 23,27 ), e o índice de proteção utilizado é igual ao superior a 30 em mais de 80%. Há relatos na …”
Section: Discussionunclassified