The scope of coaching in the context of organizational change

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to explore the scope of coaching in the context of organizational change considering peculiar issues associated with the use of coaching in Latvia and Lithuania. This two-stage study seeks to answer the following research questions. How is coaching defined? What is the aim of coaching? Who are involved in coaching? What coaching outcomes are expected? During the first stage, the definitions of coaching are extracted from the literature and analyzed to identify the distinctive features of coaching. During the second stage, the experts are interviewed to explore the views of practitioners in coaching about a place of coaching in organizations. Literature review, content analysis and comparative analysis are used for the purposes of this study. Triangulation of research results is obtained through cross verification from two sources. A total of 41 definitions of coaching were extracted from the literature and taken for analysis. Based on the established criteria for selection, nine experts participated in an interview. As a result, content analysis and comparative analysis have revealed that coaching is defined as a regular, synergetic, learning and development, goal-oriented process. Facilitation is a primary aim of coaching. Coaching is more beneficial for people who provide decisions. Achieved results and personal growth is considered as the key expected coaching outcomes. Coaching provides greater goal clarity, better alignment with the roles in the organization. However, the possible threats and challenges, such as stereotype and misunderstanding, lack of systematic approach to coaching engagements as well as its alignment with organizational change needs, have also been detected. It is difficult to explain how effective coaching can be because coaching is not homogeneous and it is difficult to measure the results of coaching.

Is Narcissism Sustainable in CEO Leadership of State-Owned Enterprises?

“…Many studies show that the chief executive officers (CEOs) of privately owned companies influence the performance of companies through management skills and experiences [1][2][3][4]. The state sector has always been an important element of many economies, including the most advanced ones [5].…”

Coaching to Tackle COVID-19 Crisis: A Critical Review for Management Practitioners

“…Although CIPD mainly defines coaching from an organizational perspective, it also believes that coaching positively impacts employees' personal life outside the work context (Gaddis & Foster, 2015). Rosha and Lace (2016) consider coaching a useful managerial tool used by managers as coaches towards employees being the client for performance development purposes (Grant, 2017). Coaching has also been defined as an essential leadership and management activity that help leaders deal with employees in a more effective way to generate financial profit by driving employees and teams to targeted outcomes.…”

The Effects of Maturity of Project Portfolio Management and Business Alignment on PMO Efficiency

“…Furthermore, since the quality management can enhance business performance [31], the project quality management by the PMO is getting more important. Also, the organizational change is deemed a trigger event that leads to the organizational development [32], and the awareness for the need for change in management has been raised [33]. In this point of view, the PMO function has a vital role to play in helping organizations adopt and integrate change management with project management [33].…”