2009
DOI: 10.1002/sce.20366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The scientific method and scientific inquiry: Tensions in teaching and learning

Abstract: Typically, the scientiÞc method in science classrooms takes the form of discrete, ordered steps meant to guide students' inquiry. In this paper, we examine how focusing on the scientiÞc method as discrete steps affects students' inquiry and teachers' perceptions thereof. To do so, we study a ninth-grade environmental science class in which students Þrst reviewed a typical version of the scientiÞc method, then brainstormed about which sites on school grounds could be good earthworm habitats and how to test thei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0
12

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(37 reference statements)
1
60
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…It means that scientific approach is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, and correcting and integrating previous knowledge. Tang et al (2009) says that scientific approach has the characteristics of "doing science". This approach allows teachers to improve the process of learning by breaking the process down into steps or stages which contains detailed instructions for conducting students learning.…”
Section: Scientific Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It means that scientific approach is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, and correcting and integrating previous knowledge. Tang et al (2009) says that scientific approach has the characteristics of "doing science". This approach allows teachers to improve the process of learning by breaking the process down into steps or stages which contains detailed instructions for conducting students learning.…”
Section: Scientific Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) is that these actions may in actuality be a part of a different activity from design, particularly in school or interview settings. Phenomena of students carrying out steps in the service of making their way through a worksheet or an instructed procedure are familiar in other areas, from science investigations (Tang, Coffey, Elby, & Levin, 2010) to math class (Schoenfeld, 1988). As a result, science education researchers have argued that practices such as experimentation and argumentation need to be embedded in a larger endeavor of building and evaluating models of the natural world (Berland & Hammer, 2012;Ford & Forman, 2006;Hammer, 1995;Lehrer, Schauble, & Petrosino, 2001).…”
Section: Problem Scoping Nested Within a Disciplinary Pursuitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engaging students in the culture of STEM does not mean getting students to engage in the "scientific method," as the latter is in fact heavily simplified (Abd-El- Khalick, 2012;Lawson, 2010;Tang, Coffey, Elby, & Levin, 2010). STEM professionals do not always start an investigation with a hypothesis, but often engage in an exploratory investigation to identify pertinent variables or to simply observe and describe a system (Franklin, 2005;Klahr & Simon, 1999;Lawson, 2010).…”
Section: Iterative Nature Of Stemmentioning
confidence: 99%