“…The potential dominance of the power discourse-politics (ideology) and religion-thus influenced the supposedly most important discourse, one that should uniformly rule psychology: the scientific discourse. This situation was also undoubtedly affected by the tension between the Polish Society for the Study of Religions (founded 1958, and in operation till present day), whose Marxist-oriented members were often against religion, and the Catholic milieu (Grzymała-Moszczyńska & Hoffmann, 1998). On the other hand, this binary character of the discipline was often related to personal choices, and some scholars tried to avoid taking either stance, at least in publications, while others later maintained that their anti-religious, Marxist stance was just a declaration made for political reasons (Hoffmann, 2015, p. 107) which can of course also be seen as an excuse, or an attempt to change the team in the last minute of the match.…”