1998
DOI: 10.1163/157006898x00150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Science of Religion in Poland: Past and Present

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No continuation of psychobiographical research has been conducted (Citlak, 2021b; Witwicki, 1909, 1958). A similar fate befell Witwicki's and Blachowski's original achievements in the psychology of religion—they have not found application in the research of Polish psychologists of religion, apart from in historical memoirs (Grzymała‐Moszczyńska & Hoffmann, 1991, 1998). The works of Rzepa (1991, 1997b, 1998, 2002) and her attempts to systematize the psychological achievements of the Lvov‐Warsaw School are an exception in this context.…”
Section: The Shape Of Polish Psychology After the Communist Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…No continuation of psychobiographical research has been conducted (Citlak, 2021b; Witwicki, 1909, 1958). A similar fate befell Witwicki's and Blachowski's original achievements in the psychology of religion—they have not found application in the research of Polish psychologists of religion, apart from in historical memoirs (Grzymała‐Moszczyńska & Hoffmann, 1991, 1998). The works of Rzepa (1991, 1997b, 1998, 2002) and her attempts to systematize the psychological achievements of the Lvov‐Warsaw School are an exception in this context.…”
Section: The Shape Of Polish Psychology After the Communist Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential dominance of the power discourse-politics (ideology) and religion-thus influenced the supposedly most important discourse, one that should uniformly rule psychology: the scientific discourse. This situation was also undoubtedly affected by the tension between the Polish Society for the Study of Religions (founded 1958, and in operation till present day), whose Marxist-oriented members were often against religion, and the Catholic milieu (Grzymała-Moszczyńska & Hoffmann, 1998). On the other hand, this binary character of the discipline was often related to personal choices, and some scholars tried to avoid taking either stance, at least in publications, while others later maintained that their anti-religious, Marxist stance was just a declaration made for political reasons (Hoffmann, 2015, p. 107) which can of course also be seen as an excuse, or an attempt to change the team in the last minute of the match.…”
Section: A Problematic Inheritance: Polish Psychology Of Religion After 1989mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1. More about the general history of the psychology of religion in Poland: Grzymała-Moszczyńska & Hoffmann, 1998; Hoffmann, 2015 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%