2017
DOI: 10.1111/acps.12780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The science and practice of psychotherapy: the critical need for quality assurance and vigilance to monitor the ratio of benefits to risks of therapies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[15][16][17]. Although there has been numerous research on adapting psychotherapies into current scientific methods [18][19][20], there is no consensus on whether these approaches belong under a common roof or employ the same scientific and logical method [2,13].…”
Section: Psychotherapy: a Field Of Chaosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17]. Although there has been numerous research on adapting psychotherapies into current scientific methods [18][19][20], there is no consensus on whether these approaches belong under a common roof or employ the same scientific and logical method [2,13].…”
Section: Psychotherapy: a Field Of Chaosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in comparison with research on positive effects supporting the efficacy of psychotherapy, research on negative effects is still rare. At the beginning of the 21st century, attention increased to the negative effects of psychotherapeutic interventions (Crawford et al, ; Scott, ). Psychotherapists as well as researchers highlight that negative effects are common in face‐to‐face care, for example, in group psychotherapy (Schneibel et al, ), as well as in Internet‐based interventions (Boettcher, Rozental, Andersson, & Carlbring, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%